ICC ISSUES ARREST WARRANT ON PRESIDENT BASHIR OF THE SUDAN

March 4, 2009 3:24 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

E06124A1-516D-435A-B118-518CE48055A3.jpg

UNITED NATIONS, 4 March 2009 – The International Criminal Court (ICC) today issued an arrest warrant for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the strife-torn Darfur region by Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir, the first sitting Head of State to be indicted by the Court.
In an early reaction, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon pledged that the United Nations’ extensive humanitarian and peacekeeping operations in Sudan will continue, stressing the ICC’s status as an “independent judicial institution,” in a statement issued by his spokesperson.

Mr. Al-Bashir was indicted on two counts of war crimes and five counts of crimes against humanity. However, the Hague-based ICC’s pre-trial chamber found there was insufficient evidence to charge him with genocide, but stressed that if the prosecution presents additional evidence the warrant could be amended at a later date.

“He is suspected of being criminally responsible, as an indirect (co-)perpetrator, for intentionally directing attacks against an important part of the civilian population of Darfur, Sudan, murdering, exterminating, raping, torturing and forcibly transferring large numbers of civilians, and pillaging their property,” according to a press release issued by the Court.

An estimated 300,000 people have died in Darfur, either through direct combat or because of disease, malnutrition or reduced life expectancy, over the past five years in Darfur, where rebels have been fighting Government forces and allied Arab militiamen, known as the Janjaweed, since 2003.

Last July, Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo presented evidence to the Court against Mr. Al-Bashir for alleged crimes in Darfur, some three years after the Security Council requested him to investigate atrocities committed in the region.

These crimes, the chamber said, were allegedly committed during the Sudanese Government’s 2003-2008 counter-insurgency campaign waged against armed groups including the Sudan Liberation Movement Army (SLM-A) and the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM).

It said that a key element of this campaign was the “unlawful attack” on civilians – belonging mostly to the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa groups seen to be allied to the groups opposing the Government in Darfur – by Sudanese forces, including the Janjaweed.

As the President of Sudan and Commander-in-Chief of the Sudanese Armed Forces, Mr. Al-Bashir allegedly directed the campaign and put it into place, the ICC found.

“Omar Al-Bashir’s official capacity as a sitting Head of State does not exclude his criminal responsibility, nor does it grant him immunity against prosecution before the ICC,” the press release said.

Today’s warrant issued for Mr. Al-Bashir marks the third to arise from the situation in Darfur. In May 2008, the pre-trial chamber issued arrest warrants for Ahmad Harun, former Sudanese Minister of State for the Interior and now the Minister of State for Humanitarian Affairs, and Ali Kushayb, a Janjaweed leader.

Mr. Ban, in the statement issued by his spokesperson, called on the Sudanese Government to continue cooperating fully with all of the world body’s entities, “while fulfilling its obligation to ensure the safety and security of the civilian population, UN personnel and property, and that of its implementing partners.”

Earlier this week, the top UN peacekeeping official said that regardless of the ICC’s decision, the hybrid UN-African Union (AU) mission in Darfur (UNAMID) will continue protecting the local population.

“The Government would assume its full duty of protecting UN missions in Sudan against any negative impact that may result from ICC possible decision against the Sudanese political leadership,” Under-Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations Alain Le Roy told journalists in New York on Monday.

One year on from transferring the task of suppressing the violence to UNAMID from the AU Mission in Sudan (AMIS), just over 60 per cent of the 19,555 military personnel authorized by the Security Council are now in place across Darfur.

To comment on this article, please click here.


NICKY ANOSIKE IS “NCAA WOMAN OF THE YEAR, 2008”

November 3, 2008 12:36 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

NIKKY ANOSIKE.jpg

NDIANAPOLIS, Indiana, Oct. 25 — When a story of any woman of endurance and substance is written, it would never be complete if it doesn’t include the name of Ngozi Anosike, a woman who has raised eight incredibly high-achieving children all by herself.  Married before she had finished her high school in Nigeria, when she found herself abandoned in Staten Island, New York, after having 8 children, she made up her mind that she was going to grab success from the mouth of defeat.  She got her high school equivalency, entered into the school of nursing, graduated as a registered nurse, began working two or three shifts, and then set out to ensure that her children didn’t suffer too much. 

Out of the eight, one is a registered nurse and midwife, another a medical doctor, one just finished at Rutgers and doing her masters in nursing, another graduated from Boston University and another just signed to attend Siena College and play basketball in New York State, having turned down such schools like Fordham, Rutgers, Temple, Hofstra, Penn State, etc. He is 6’8”.  But it is not Ngozi Anosike’s story we are telling today, it is Nkolika “Nicky” Anosike we are telling today.

NICKY-ANOSIKE.jpg


Nkolika “Nicky” Anosike, a former basketball student-athlete at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, was awarded the 2008 NCAA Woman of the Year.

The award — one of the most prestigious the NCAA bestows — was accepted by her former coach at Tennessee, Pat Summit, and her mother, Ngozi Anosike. Nicky Anosike could not attend the event because she is playing professional basketball in Israel during the WNBA off-season.

The two women accepted the award at the 18th annual NCAA Woman of the Year dinner on Sunday, October 19, at the Murat Centre Egyptian Room. The award honors female student-athletes who have completed their eligibility, demonstrated academic and athletics excellence and engaged in community service and leadership opportunities.

A committee comprised of representatives from NCAA schools and conferences selected the top 30 out of 134 conference and independent nominees, 10 from each division. From the 30 honorees, nine finalists were selected, three from each division. The Committee on Women’s Athletics selected Anosike from the nine finalists.

Anosike, a native of Staten Island, N.Y., is the third NCAA Woman of the Year from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and the second basketball student-athlete to be named NCAA Woman of the Year. She represents the Southeastern Conference (SEC).

A triple major in political science, legal studies and sociology, Anoskie was named to the SEC Academic Honor Roll four consecutive years. Her academic prowess earned her honors as ESPN the Magazine Academic All-American, second team and the SEC Boyd McWhorter Postgraduate Scholarship for Tennessee. She was regularly on the Lady Vol Honor Roll and was on the DeanÕs List, ESPN The Magazine All-District IV, first team and third team and the Thornton Center Honor Roll at Tennessee.

In addition to excelling in the classroom, Anosike was – and continues to be – an exceptional performer on the court. She played center/forward for the Lady Vols, who won the NCAA National Championship in 2007 and 2008. She was a member of one SEC regular-season and three SEC tournament championship teams and twice led the Lady Vols in blocked shots. She was a member of two USA under 19 Women’s Basketball World Championship teams and the 2007 Pan-American team. She was drafted into the WNBA by the Minnesota Lynx, where she started in all 34 games during the 2008 season and averaged 9.2 points and 6.8 rebounds per game. She is currently playing basketball in Israel during the WNBA off-season.

Outside of the classroom and the court, Anosike participated in many service and leadership roles. She served as team captain in 2007-08 and was a member of the campus Student-Athlete Advisory Committee (SAAC). She volunteered for the East Tennessee Children’s Hospital, Second Harvest, April Play Day for the local Boys and Girls Clubs, an elementary school career day and the Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure and Lady Vol Fund Run.

“Leadership through example makes a difference,” Anosike said in her personal statement on her nomination form."I have had opportunities to learn this lesson, most recently as I helped lead the Lady Vols basketball team to its eighth national championship. I was not the superstar; I did the unglamorous work that wins games and brings success in life. “Some of our most effective leaders are not in the spotlight, but lead by example through hard work and dedication. This assertion reflects who I am and what I hope to become.”

Last year’s NCAA Woman of the Year was Whitney Myers, former swimmer at the University of Arizona. Myers graduated with a degree in science education with an emphasis in biology/pre-pharmacy. She was the second NCAA Woman of the Year from the University of Arizona and the fifth swimming student-athlete to be named NCAA Woman of the Year.

NGOZI.jpg


Nicky attributes all her success to her mom, Ngozi Anosike, above, who received the NCAA Woman of the Year, 2008 Award,” on her behalf.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Candidate McCain’s Big Decision

September 3, 2008 9:03 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

From the New York Times:

More often than not, the role of a vice president is a minor one, unless some tragedy occurs. But a presidential nominee’s choice of a running mate is vitally mportant. It is his first executive decision and offers an important insight into how that nominee would lead the nation.

If John McCain wants voters to conclude, as he argues, that he has more independence and experience and better judgment than Barack Obama, he made a bad start by choosing Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska.

Mr. McCain’s supporters are valiantly trying to argue that the selection was a bold stroke that shows their candidate is a risk-taking maverick who - we can believe - will change Washington. (Mr. Obama’s call for change - now “the change we need” - has become all the rage in St. Paul.)

To us, it says the opposite. Mr. McCain’s snap choice of Ms. Palin reflects his impulsive streak: a wild play that he made after conservative activists warned him that he would face an all-out revolt in the party if he chose who he really wanted - Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut.

Why Mr. McCain would want to pander to right-wing activists - who helped George W. Bush kill off his candidacy in the 2000 primaries in a particularly ugly way - is baffling. Frankly, they have no place to go. Mr. McCain would have a lot more success demonstrating his independence, and his courage, if he stood up to them the way he did in 2000.

As far as we can tell, Mr. McCain and his aides did almost no due diligence before choosing Ms. Palin, raising serious questions about his management skills. The fact that Ms. Palin’s 17-year-old daughter is pregnant is irrelevant to her candidacy. There are, however, very serious questions about her political past and her ideology.

If Mr. McCain wanted to break with his party’s past and choose the Republicans’ first female vice presidential candidate, there are a number of politicians out there with far greater experience and stature than Ms. Palin, who has been in Alaska’s Statehouse for less than two years.

Before she was elected governor, she was mayor of a tiny Anchorage suburb, where her greatest accomplishment was raising the sales tax to build a hockey rink. According to Time magazine, she also sought to have books banned from the local library and threatened to fire the librarian....read whole article here.

To comment on this article, please click here.


American Media Tougher on Obama Than His Opponent McCain

July 28, 2008 9:38 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

By James Rainey, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
July 27, 2008

Haters of the mainstream media reheated a bit of conventional wisdom last week.

Barack Obama, they said, was getting a free ride from those insufferable liberals.

Such pronouncements, sorry to say, tend to be wrong since they describe a monolithic media that no longer exists. Information today cascades from countless outlets and channels, from the Huffington Post to Politico.com to CBS News and beyond.

But now there’s additional evidence that casts doubt on the bias claims aimed—with particular venom—at three broadcast networks.

The Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University, where researchers have tracked network news content for two decades, found that ABC, NBC and CBS were tougher on Obama than on Republican John McCain during the first six weeks of the general-election campaign.

You read it right: tougher on the Democrat.

During the evening news, the majority of statements from reporters and anchors on all three networks are neutral, the center found. And when network news people ventured opinions in recent weeks, 28% of the statements were positive for Obama and 72% negative.

Network reporting also tilted against McCain, but far less dramatically, with 43% of the statements positive and 57% negative, according to the Washington-based media center.

Conservatives have been snarling about the grotesque disparity revealed by another study, the online Tyndall Report, which showed Obama receiving more than twice as much network air time as McCain in the last month and a half. Obama got 166 minutes of coverage in the seven weeks after the end of the primary season, compared with 67 minutes for McCain, according to longtime network-news observer Andrew Tyndall.

I wrote last week that the networks should do more to better balance the air time. But I also suggested that much of the attention to Obama was far from glowing....read the full story here

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICANANEWSWORLD

July 28, 2008 6:57 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

ZIMBABWE TALKS AT A STANDSTILL

PRETORIA, Africa South, July 28 - Unnamed sources in Zimbabwe’s MDC opposition say historic talks with the governing Zanu-PF party are deadlocked.

A dispute has apparently arisen over a push by President Robert Mugabe’s party to have MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai appointed “third vice-president”.

The MDC sources said this was “insulting”, and reflected negatively on the talks’ facilitator, President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa.

Talks began last week after a rare meeting between the two leaders.

The delicate negotiations following this year’s disputed elections are meant to be happening under a news blackout, but sources in the Tsvangirai camp have told the BBC that they have now ground to a halt… read whole story

SUDAN RALLIES BEHIND LEADER REVILED ABROAD

In today’s New York Times front-page, there is an article about how people in the Sudan, from different political spectrum, were lining up behind President Omar al-Bashir to show solidarity with him.  Last week, the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, filed charges against Bashir for genocide and crimes against humanity.  The article tries to paint a picture of a Sudan that would break up if Bashir was removed or arrested, and engender a situation like Somalia.... read the full story here.

OIL UP ON NIGERIAN ATTACK, DEMAND STILL A
(AP) - Oil prices fluctuated Monday after an attack by militants on Nigerian oil pipelines and comments by Iran’s president suggested a significant increase in the country’s nuclear program. Concerns about flagging U.S. demand once again limited the gains.

Light, sweet crude for September delivery rose 77 cents to $124.03 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract fell $2.23 to settle at $123.26 a barrel on Friday _ a drop of more than $20 in just weeks _ as investors questioned whether crude’s decline reflects a serious deterioration in demand....read the full story here

CHINA TO INVEST $3.3 BILLION IN NIGERIA’S POWER SECTOR

China is to invest the sum of $3.3 billion in Nigeria’s power sector, which has been plagued by shortages and no light supplies, sometimes reaching 30 days....read the full story here

$100 MILLION MISSING FRO NIGERIAN MISSIONS’ ACCOUNT - REPS

A whopping N10.2 billion is allegedly missing from the accounts of some Nigerian missions abroad and the Finance Committee of the House of Representatives which made the discovery has insisted that the money must be found by the Foreign Affairs Ministry and paid into the federation account...read full story here

THE MANUAL FOR DESPOTS

Robert Gabriel Mugabe and Morgan Richard Tsvangirai held hands. Mugabe tried to lift Tsvangirai’s hand above the shoulder, to join it in his in a triumphant double fist, a gesture reminiscent of the moment he held up Joshua Nkomo’s hand and with that gesture killed opposition politics in Zimbabwe for a long 12 years.

Tsvangirai may also have had Joshua Nkomo in mind, at that moment, because he seemed to resist this, his hand remained just below shoulder level, and Mugabe had to be content with a sideways shake and a toothy grin. Mugabe grinned. Tsvangirai grinned. Arthur Guseni Oliver Mutambara grinned. Thabo Mvuyelwa Mbeki grinned. They all grinned and were happy together.

It is surreal, this orgy of grinning, this sudden, blinding flashing of teeth: barely a month ago the pictures of torture camps filled television and computer screens, photographs of burnt bodies illustrated the stories of horror from Zimbabwe. Seared on the minds of millions were the story of the death of Abigail Chiroto, killed in an arson attack, and the haunting image of Joshua Bakacheza, diminished and fragile in his death, just two of the victims that made the front-page news of just about any newspaper that gave prominence to Zimbabwe. Tsvangirai was warning the world about genocide in Zimbabwe. Barely a month later he is sitting down to talk with the genocidaire-in-chief.... read the full story

To comment on this article, please click here.


Obama Addresses Berlin And The World

July 25, 2008 1:15 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

A World that Stands as One”

July 24th, 2008

Berlin, Germany

Thank you to the citizens of Berlin and to the people of Germany. Let me thank Chancellor Merkel and Foreign Minister Steinmeier for welcoming me earlier today. Thank you Mayor Wowereit, the Berlin Senate, the police, and most of all thank you for this welcome.

2008-07-24-sun.jpg

I come to Berlin as so many of my countrymen have come before. Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen - a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world.

I know that I don’t look like the Americans who’ve previously spoken in this great city. The journey that led me here is improbable. My mother was born in the heartland of America, but my father grew up herding goats in Kenya. His father - my grandfather - was a cook, a domestic servant to the British.

At the height of the Cold War, my father decided, like so many others in the forgotten corners of the world, that his yearning - his dream - required the freedom and opportunity promised by the West. And so he wrote letter after letter to universities all across America until somebody, somewhere answered his prayer for a better life.

That is why I’m here. And you are here because you too know that yearning. This city, of all cities, knows the dream of freedom. And you know that the only reason we stand here tonight is because men and women from both of our nations came together to work, and struggle, and sacrifice for that better life.

2008-07-24-love.jpg

Ours is a partnership that truly began sixty years ago this summer, on the day when the first American plane touched down at Templehof.

On that day, much of this continent still lay in ruin. The rubble of this city had yet to be built into a wall. The Soviet shadow had swept across Eastern Europe, while in the West, America, Britain, and France took stock of their losses, and pondered how the world might be remade.

This is where the two sides met. And on the twenty-fourth of June, 1948, the Communists chose to blockade the western part of the city. They cut off food and supplies to more than two million Germans in an effort to extinguish the last flame of freedom in Berlin.

The size of our forces was no match for the much larger Soviet Army. And yet retreat would have allowed Communism to march across Europe. Where the last war had ended, another World War could have easily begun. All that stood in the way was Berlin.

And that’s when the airlift began - when the largest and most unlikely rescue in history brought food and hope to the people of this city.

The odds were stacked against success. In the winter, a heavy fog filled the sky above, and many planes were forced to turn back without dropping off the needed supplies. The streets where we stand were filled with hungry families who had no comfort from the cold.

But in the darkest hours, the people of Berlin kept the flame of hope burning. The people of Berlin refused to give up. And on one fall day, hundreds of thousands of Berliners came here, to the Tiergarten, and heard the city’s mayor implore the world not to give up on freedom. “There is only one possibility,” he said. “For us to stand together united until this battle is won...The people of Berlin have spoken. We have done our duty, and we will keep on doing our duty. People of the world: now do your duty...People of the world, look at Berlin!”

People of the world - look at Berlin!

2008-07-24-crowds.jpg

Look at Berlin, where Germans and Americans learned to work together and trust each other less than three years after facing each other on the field of battle.

Look at Berlin, where the determination of a people met the generosity of the Marshall Plan and created a German miracle; where a victory over tyranny gave rise to NATO, the greatest alliance ever formed to defend our common security.

Look at Berlin, where the bullet holes in the buildings and the somber stones and pillars near the Brandenburg Gate insist that we never forget our common humanity.

People of the world - look at Berlin, where a wall came down, a continent came together, and history proved that there is no challenge too great for a world that stands as one.

Sixty years after the airlift, we are called upon again. History has led us to a new crossroad, with new promise and new peril. When you, the German people, tore down that wall - a wall that divided East and West; freedom and tyranny; fear and hope - walls came tumbling down around the world. From Kiev to Cape Town, prison camps were closed, and the doors of democracy were opened. Markets opened too, and the spread of information and technology reduced barriers to opportunity and prosperity. While the 20th century taught us that we share a common destiny, the 21st has revealed a world more intertwined than at any time in human history.

The fall of the Berlin Wall brought new hope. But that very closeness has given rise to new dangers - dangers that cannot be contained within the borders of a country or by the distance of an ocean.

The terrorists of September 11th plotted in Hamburg and trained in Kandahar and Karachi before killing thousands from all over the globe on American soil.

As we speak, cars in Boston and factories in Beijing are melting the ice caps in the Arctic, shrinking coastlines in the Atlantic, and bringing drought to farms from Kansas to Kenya.

Poorly secured nuclear material in the former Soviet Union, or secrets from a scientist in Pakistan could help build a bomb that detonates in Paris. The poppies in Afghanistan become the heroin in Berlin. The poverty and violence in Somalia breeds the terror of tomorrow. The genocide in Darfur shames the conscience of us all.

In this new world, such dangerous currents have swept along faster than our efforts to contain them. That is why we cannot afford to be divided. No one nation, no matter how large or powerful, can defeat such challenges alone. None of us can deny these threats, or escape responsibility in meeting them. Yet, in the absence of Soviet tanks and a terrible wall, it has become easy to forget this truth. And if we’re honest with each other, we know that sometimes, on both sides of the Atlantic, we have drifted apart, and forgotten our shared destiny.

2008-07-24-screen.jpg

In Europe, the view that America is part of what has gone wrong in our world, rather than a force to help make it right, has become all too common. In America, there are voices that deride and deny the importance of Europe’s role in our security and our future. Both views miss the truth - that Europeans today are bearing new burdens and taking more responsibility in critical parts of the world; and that just as American bases built in the last century still help to defend the security of this continent, so does our country still sacrifice greatly for freedom around the globe.

Yes, there have been differences between America and Europe. No doubt, there will be differences in the future. But the burdens of global citizenship continue to bind us together. A change of leadership in Washington will not lift this burden. In this new century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do more - not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect our common security and advance our common humanity.

That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another.

The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down.

We know they have fallen before. After centuries of strife, the people of Europe have formed a Union of promise and prosperity. Here, at the base of a column built to mark victory in war, we meet in the center of a Europe at peace. Not only have walls come down in Berlin, but they have come down in Belfast, where Protestant and Catholic found a way to live together; in the Balkans, where our Atlantic alliance ended wars and brought savage war criminals to justice; and in South Africa, where the struggle of a courageous people defeated apartheid.

So history reminds us that walls can be torn down. But the task is never easy. True partnership and true progress requires constant work and sustained sacrifice. They require sharing the burdens of development and diplomacy; of progress and peace. They require allies who will listen to each other, learn from each other and, most of all, trust each other.

That is why America cannot turn inward. That is why Europe cannot turn inward. America has no better partner than Europe. Now is the time to build new bridges across the globe as strong as the one that bound us across the Atlantic. Now is the time to join together, through constant cooperation, strong institutions, shared sacrifice, and a global commitment to progress, to meet the challenges of the 21st century. It was this spirit that led airlift planes to appear in the sky above our heads, and people to assemble where we stand today. And this is the moment when our nations - and all nations - must summon that spirit anew.

This is the moment when we must defeat terror and dry up the well of extremism that supports it. This threat is real and we cannot shrink from our responsibility to combat it. If we could create NATO to face down the Soviet Union, we can join in a new and global partnership to dismantle the networks that have struck in Madrid and Amman; in London and Bali; in Washington and New York. If we could win a battle of ideas against the communists, we can stand with the vast majority of Muslims who reject the extremism that leads to hate instead of hope.

This is the moment when we must renew our resolve to rout the terrorists who threaten our security in Afghanistan, and the traffickers who sell drugs on your streets. No one welcomes war. I recognize the enormous difficulties in Afghanistan. But my country and yours have a stake in seeing that NATO’s first mission beyond Europe’s borders is a success. For the people of Afghanistan, and for our shared security, the work must be done. America cannot do this alone. The Afghan people need our troops and your troops; our support and your support to defeat the Taliban and al Qaeda, to develop their economy, and to help them rebuild their nation. We have too much at stake to turn back now.

This is the moment when we must renew the goal of a world without nuclear weapons. The two superpowers that faced each other across the wall of this city came too close too often to destroying all we have built and all that we love. With that wall gone, we need not stand idly by and watch the further spread of the deadly atom. It is time to secure all loose nuclear materials; to stop the spread of nuclear weapons; and to reduce the arsenals from another era. This is the moment to begin the work of seeking the peace of a world without nuclear weapons.

This is the moment when every nation in Europe must have the chance to choose its own tomorrow free from the shadows of yesterday. In this century, we need a strong European Union that deepens the security and prosperity of this continent, while extending a hand abroad. In this century - in this city of all cities - we must reject the Cold War mind-set of the past, and resolve to work with Russia when we can, to stand up for our values when we must, and to seek a partnership that extends across this entire continent.

This is the moment when we must build on the wealth that open markets have created, and share its benefits more equitably. Trade has been a cornerstone of our growth and global development. But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many. Together, we must forge trade that truly rewards the work that creates wealth, with meaningful protections for our people and our planet. This is the moment for trade that is free and fair for all.

This is the moment we must help answer the call for a new dawn in the Middle East. My country must stand with yours and with Europe in sending a direct message to Iran that it must abandon its nuclear ambitions. We must support the Lebanese who have marched and bled for democracy, and the Israelis and Palestinians who seek a secure and lasting peace. And despite past differences, this is the moment when the world should support the millions of Iraqis who seek to rebuild their lives, even as we pass responsibility to the Iraqi government and finally bring this war to a close.

This is the moment when we must come together to save this planet. Let us resolve that we will not leave our children a world where the oceans rise and famine spreads and terrible storms devastate our lands. Let us resolve that all nations - including my own - will act with the same seriousness of purpose as has your nation, and reduce the carbon we send into our atmosphere. This is the moment to give our children back their future. This is the moment to stand as one.

And this is the moment when we must give hope to those left behind in a globalized world. We must remember that the Cold War born in this city was not a battle for land or treasure. Sixty years ago, the planes that flew over Berlin did not drop bombs; instead they delivered food, and coal, and candy to grateful children. And in that show of solidarity, those pilots won more than a military victory. They won hearts and minds; love and loyalty and trust - not just from the people in this city, but from all those who heard the story of what they did here.

Now the world will watch and remember what we do here - what we do with this moment. Will we extend our hand to the people in the forgotten corners of this world who yearn for lives marked by dignity and opportunity; by security and justice? Will we lift the child in Bangladesh from poverty, shelter the refugee in Chad, and banish the scourge of AIDS in our time?

Will we stand for the human rights of the dissident in Burma, the blogger in Iran, or the voter in Zimbabwe? Will we give meaning to the words “never again” in Darfur?

Will we acknowledge that there is no more powerful example than the one each of our nations projects to the world? Will we reject torture and stand for the rule of law? Will we welcome immigrants from different lands, and shun discrimination against those who don’t look like us or worship like we do, and keep the promise of equality and opportunity for all of our people?

2008-07-24-statue.jpg

People of Berlin - people of the world - this is our moment. This is our time.

I know my country has not perfected itself. At times, we’ve struggled to keep the promise of liberty and equality for all of our people. We’ve made our share of mistakes, and there are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions.

But I also know how much I love America. I know that for more than two centuries, we have strived - at great cost and great sacrifice - to form a more perfect union; to seek, with other nations, a more hopeful world. Our allegiance has never been to any particular tribe or kingdom - indeed, every language is spoken in our country; every culture has left its imprint on ours; every point of view is expressed in our public squares. What has always united us - what has always driven our people; what drew my father to America’s shores - is a set of ideals that speak to aspirations shared by all people: that we can live free from fear and free from want; that we can speak our minds and assemble with whomever we choose and worship as we please.

These are the aspirations that joined the fates of all nations in this city. These aspirations are bigger than anything that drives us apart. It is because of these aspirations that the airlift began. It is because of these aspirations that all free people - everywhere - became citizens of Berlin. It is in pursuit of these aspirations that a new generation - our generation - must make our mark on the world.

People of Berlin - and people of the world - the scale of our challenge is great. The road ahead will be long. But I come before you to say that we are heirs to a struggle for freedom. We are a people of improbable hope. With an eye toward the future, with resolve in our hearts, let us remember this history, and answer our destiny, and remake the world once again.

2008-07-24-obamaspeech.jpg

To comment on this article, please click here.


IRAQ LEADER MALIKI SUPPORTS OBAMA’S WITHDRAWAL PLANS

July 20, 2008 12:05 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki supports US presidential candidate Barack Obama’s plan to withdraw US troops from Iraq within 16 months. When asked in and interview with SPIEGEL when he thinks US troops should leave Iraq, Maliki responded “as soon as possible, as far as we are concerned.” He then continued: “US presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.”

MALIKI.tiff

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki says he agrees with US presidential candidate Barack Obama’s plans for withdrawing US troops from Iraq.

Maliki was careful to back away from outright support for Obama. “Of course, this is by no means an election endorsement. Who they choose as their president is the Americans’ business,” he said. But then, apparently referring to Republican candidate John McCain’s more open-ended Iraq policy, Maliki said: “Those who operate on the premise of short time periods in Iraq today are being more realistic. Artificially prolonging the tenure of US troops in Iraq would cause problems.”
Iraq, Maliki went on to say, “would like to see the establishment of a long-term strategic treaty with the United States, which would govern the basic aspects of our economic and cultural relations.” He also emphasized though that the security agreement between the two countries should only “remain in effect in the short term.”

The comments by the Iraqi leader come as Obama embarks on a trip to both Afghanistan and Iraq as well as to Europe. Obama was in Afghanistan on Saturday to, as he said prior to his trip, “see what the situation on the ground is … and thank our troops for the heroic work that they’ve been doing.” The exact itinerary of the candidate’s trip has not been made public out of security concerns, but it is widely expected that he will arrive in Iraq on Sunday to meet with Maliki.

Maliki has long shown impatience with the open-ended presence of US troops in Iraq. In his conversation with SPIEGEL, he was once again candid about his frustration over the Bush administration’s hesitancy about agreeing to a timetable for the withdrawal of US troops. But he did say he was optimistic that such a schedule would be drawn up before Bush leaves the White House next January—a confidence that appeared justified following Friday’s joint announcement in Baghdad and Washington that Bush has now, for the first time, spoken of “a general time horizon” for moving US troops out of Iraq.
“So far the Americans have had trouble agreeing to a concrete timetable for withdrawal, because they feel it would appear tantamount to an admission of defeat,” Maliki told SPIEGEL. “But that isn’t the case at all. If we come to an agreement, it is not evidence of a defeat, but of a victory, of a severe blow we have inflicted on al-Qaida and the militias.”

He also bemoaned the fact that Baghdad has little control over the US troops in Iraq. “It is a fundamental problem for us that it should not be possible, in my country, to prosecute offences or crimes committed by US soldiers against our population,” Maliki said.

cgh/SPIEGEL

To comment on this article, please click here.


HOW OBAMA FLEW OUT OF THE COUNTRY

July 19, 2008 11:58 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

HOW OBAMA SLIPPED OUT OF COUNTRY
Sat Jul 19 2008 17:02:39 ET

Pool Report

The motorcade left Sen. Obama’s home in Chicago’s Kenwood neighborhood at 11:11 a.m. There was one Chicago Police Department patrol car, followed by two SUVs, a sedan and a press van. Riding in the press van were agent Jill, Sam, John McCormick of the Chicago Tribune and Glen Johnson of The Associated Press.

The motorcade headed north on Lake Shore Drive to I-55 (Stevenson Expressway) and toward MDW. The CPD blocked traffic for our turn onto the western perimeter of the airfield, where we arrived at 11:31 a.m.

Waiting on the tarmac was a Gulfstream III (G3) executive jet (tail number N366JA). We exited our respective vehicles at 11:34 a.m.

The crew was waiting outside for the senator’s arrival and a few photos with him near a wing. He was wearing tan slacks and a short black jacket. After fishing around in the back of one of the SUVs for his luggage (he seemed especially to be checking his suits inside a garment bag), he was on the bird by 11:36 a.m.

Also getting on the plane were eight Secret Service agents and the two reporters. The senator briefly greeted us as we walked past his seat in the forward section. Seated near him was senior spokeswoman Linda Douglass, the only staff member on the flight.

After everyone found a seat on the crowded plane, the pilot announced that the flying time would be between 80 and 85 minutes. All seemed eager for him to start the engines, since the plane had been sitting under a hot sun and the cabin temperature was likely somewhere in the 90s. Sweat had begun to roll down the faces of some of the agents.

“We’re just easing you into it,” Obama told his bodyguards, referring to the heat and the desert weather they would all be traveling to in the coming days.

As the plane taxied, the senat or, wearing a short-sleeve black shirt, chatted with Douglass. The plane was wheels up at 11:55 a.m.

Your pool asked Douglass if we could chat with the senator about his upcoming trip. She said she would check, but later told us that we would only get a brief chance to ask him a couple questions once at Reagan National Airport.

Janis, our stewardess, first served the senator his lunch (chicken and rice and broccoli). Everyone else had sandwiches, wraps, chips and candy (yes, just like on the bus), although we were served on china and given green place settings and cloth napkins.

As the plane peaked around 41,000 feet and 500 knots, according to the computer screen tracking our location at the front of the cabin, the senator read a copy of the Wall20Street Journal. Johnson had claimed an aisle seat and reported that he first read a story about off-shore oil drilling and then one about Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

By the time we were descending, at 17,000 feet, he had switched to the New York Times, spending most of his time in the Sports and Arts sections.

We were wheels down at 2:17 p.m. local and parked with the engines off by 2:24 p.m.

After getting off the plane, Douglass said there was time for “one question,” adding, “Then, we’re making him leave. He’s behind [schedule].”

Your pool, with the noise of the jet’s engines in the background, quickly asked what two or three things Obama was hoping to learn on this mission.

“Well, I’m looking forward to seeing what the situation on the ground is,” he said. “I want to, obviously, talk to the commanders and get a sense, both in Afghanistan and in Baghdad of, you know, what the most, ah, their biggest concerns are. And I want to thank our troops for the heroic work that they’ve been doing.”

Then, the senator was asked whether he plans to deliver some tough talk to Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki about doing more to stand up the instruments of self-governance in their own nations.

“Well, you know, I’m more interested in listening than doing a lot of talking,” he said. “And I think it is very important to recognize that I’m going over there as a U.S. senator. We have one president at a time, so it’s the president’s job to deliver those messages.”

By 2:32 p.m., the motorcade was rolling. This one included two local police cars, three SUVs, a Honda Accord, a minivan equipped with lights and sirens and another local patrol car. We were off the DCA property by 2:36 p.m.

Your pool was in the Honda with Douglass. It was driven by Molly Buford, who works in Obama’s senator office and also for the campaign.

The mot orcade traveled I-395 to I-295 and then on to the Suitland Parkway, entering a northern entrance of Andrews Air Force Base at 2:57 p.m.

We passed several military helicopters and planes before arriving at 3:01 p.m. near an aircraft that had no markings, with the exception of an American flag on the tail. This was the plane that would transport the congressional delegation to their destination. A ground crew member told us it was a Boeing C-40C.

The senator greeted several military personnel waiting for him near the plane. He was carrying a laptop bag and had changed into some brown leather boots upon arrival in Washington.

The senator was also greeted by Mark Lippert, foreign policy advisor in his senate office. Douglass said he was the only member of Ob ama’s staff traveling with him on the congressional delegation trip. Douglass later told your pool that Lippert had returned in the late spring from a tour of duty in Iraq as a naval reservist.

By 3:03 p.m., the senator was on the aircraft, having been saluted by a member of the military on his way aboard. At 3:09 p.m., the plane’s door was closed. Four minutes later it was in motion and wheels up at 3:17 p.m., taking off to the south.

Later, Douglass confirmed that Sens. Jack Reed and Chuck Hagel were on the plane before our arrival. Your pool had not seen them at Andrews.

-- John McCormick, Chicago Tribune. 

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICANANEWSWORLD

July 17, 2008 7:54 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Telegragh.tiff

BRITAIN’S CONSERVATIVE LEADER PRAISES OBAMA, AS HE CALLS FOR “RESPONSIBILITY REVOLUTION”

David Cameron praises Barack Obama as he calls for a “responsibility revolution”
By Lucy Cockcroft
Last Updated: 9:19PM BST 16/07/2008
David Cameron called for a “responsibility revolution” in Britain last night, as he praised Barack Obama’s warning that too many black fathers neglect their duties to their children.

The Conservative leader said that many black church leaders in this country have expressed similar anxieties, and that it was time to change the pattern of behaviour.

Mr Cameron said the Democratic candidate to become the next US President had been very “brave” in his condemnation of those fathers who do not take their responsibilities seriously.

He said: “I think he’s absolutely right. I mean I think it’s a very brave thing to do. And it will have a huge influence that he has said it.

“I’ve had a number of meetings with black church leaders who make the same point too. They are concerned about the family breakdown and social breakdown and want to see what I call a responsibility revolution take place.

“I think it is a very important part of our responsibility agenda.”

In an interview with The Guardian, Mr Cameron also said that civil rights leader Jesse Jackson was wrong when he criticised Obama’s speech on parental responsibilities as “talking down to black people”.

He acknowledged that the historic discrimination and economic disadvantage black people have experienced has had a role to play in the situation, but said: “At the same time we will never solve the long term problems unless people also take responsibility for their own lives.”

The message comes a week after the Conservative leader called for the obese, the idle and the poor to take more responsibility for themselves, saying society is too sensitive and fails to “say what needs to be said”.

He warned Britain could become a “demoralised society”, adding: “Children are growing up without boundaries, thinking they can do as they please, and why no adult will intervene to stop them - including, often, their parents. “If we are going to get any where near solving some of these problems, that has to stop.”

Speaking about his own role as a father in the interview, Mr Cameron admitted that his parenting skills are a work in progress, and disclosed that he uses the “naughty step” to discipline his children.

Mr Cameron said that in the past two years he has taken the Conservative Party to the second stage in its modernisation agenda, likening the process to moving beyond level one in the computer game Tomb Raider.

He said level one had required him to prove that he was a “reasonable, decent, non-discriminating, sensible, practical person who understands the world as it is lived today, who wants to live in the modern world and who accepts what that means.”

Now he has conquered that stage, he says it “allows the Conservatives to talk about some of the difficult issues about families and responsibilities. It can lead to trouble. You take a risk every time you do it, but I think the alternative of saying nothing is that you leave out a whole important area of social reform.”

He added: “We are not going to solve poverty by just building an even bigger tax credit system. We’re going to solve poverty by looking at its causes - the drugs, alcohol, the family breakdown.”

Mr Cameron also denied he was giving a false impression of Britain by talking of a broken society. He said: “There is a general incivility that people have to put up with, people shouting on the bus or abusing you on the street or road rage.

“There is a lot of casual violence and I think it is important to draw attention to it.”

British black leaders gave Mr Cameron’s words a cautious welcome. Tony Sewell, director of Generating Genius, which encourages black youngsters to study science, said: “This is an issue that needs to be discussed, and Cameron is well placed to discuss it, as it is in keeping with the current Tory agenda around social investment.

“This used to be very much a Labour agenda, but Labour just isn’t really delivering on it.”

Mr Obama is due to meet both Mr Cameron and Gordon Brown when he visits London next week.

SOUTH AFRICA LEGALIZING PROSTITUTION DURING WORLD CUP?
SA Sex Workers.jpg
Plans to legalise prostitution for the 2010 football World Cup in South Africa have been criticised by religious groups and opposition parties.
The local authority in Durban wants legalised adult entertainment venues during the tournament.
But African Nazareth Democratic Movement (ANDM) president Thokozani Hlatshwayo said the proposal was “against the word of God”.

To comment on this article, please click here.


SLAVERY STILL EXISTS IN NORTHERN MALI

July 15, 2008 11:13 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

UN Integrated Regional Information Networks
14 July 2008
Posted to the web 15 July 2008
Gao

People continue to be enslaved in northern Mali, according to Malian human rights organisation Temedt, despite a widespread belief that slavery no longer exists in the country.

“The government believes slavery ended with independence, when many of the people who had been living as slaves in the colonial period were freed,” said Temedt President Mohammed Ag Akeratane, “but I would estimate there are still several thousand people living in slavery or slavery-like conditions in modern Mali.”

According to Temedt, which means “solidarity” in the Touareg language Tamasheq, slavery continues in the north in the region of Gao 1,200km north of the capital, Bamako, and around the town of Menaka 1,500km north of Bamako.

Most of the slavery takes place between the Berber-descended Touaregs and the indigenous Bella people who live in this region, although the Peul and Songhai communities have also been known to use slaves in the past, according to Temedt.

Iddar Ag Ogazide, a Bella, said he lived as a slave in Ansongo, 80km south of Gao, where he worked for the Touareg Ag Baye family for 35 years without receiving a salary or an education. The Ag Bayes bought his great-grandmother and inherited his family members from one generation to the next. In March 2008 Iddar finally could not take any more and hatched a successful escape plan - he is currently living in Gao.

His wife Takwalet, who escaped with him, told IRIN: “Life was hard there. Everything I did was against my will. I did all the cooking, pounding [of millet], getting water, fetching the wood and sweeping the house. I never received money; I didn’t even get any clothes.”

Murky definitions

But discussions on slavery are complex in Mali, with many people arguing it does not exist. Some Gao residents said individuals might stay with their “masters” more out of economic necessity than anything.

Today the Bella have become largely assimilated into Touareg culture, keeping similar cultural traditions and speaking the same language (Tamasheq), and many of the Bella are known as Black Tamasheq. The Touareg masters and the Bella people have lived in a complex caste system for many decades and some say little has changed in this power relationship - much of the northern region’s property and livestock remains in the Touareg hands.

The towns of Menaka and Ansongo are harsh and isolated, with few jobs and economic opportunities. “Conditions are tough in the north, but the Bella people are free to leave their masters if they wish,” said an unnamed source in the Malian government’s Territorial Administration department. “There is not an obligation, or formalised slavery,” he said.

The implication is that some Bella people may feel unable to strike out on their own and leave the protection of their rich master, who feeds them but does not pay them. “If people came out to declare openly that they were slaves, then of course the state would do something,” said the source.

But for Anti-Slavery International the situation is more clear-cut.

“Like his parents before him, Iddar was born a slave, a status ascribed to him at birth, and [he] grew up under the total control of a master who exacted labour from him for no remuneration”, said Romana Cacchioli, Africa programme coordinator with Anti-Slavery International. “In my view Iddar’s case is a clear case of slavery.”

Murky legal framework

It is not clear what the state could do in cases such as Iddar’s, as Mali has no law formally forbidding slavery. Although Mali’s constitution states all people are equal, and the country has signed up to the major international conventions banning slavery, including the UN International Declaration on Human Rights, officially the practice was never criminalised in Mali, which makes it difficult to seek legal redress in cases such as Iddar Ag Ogazide’s.

Nevertheless, Temedt has instructed a lawyer to work with Iddar and another escaped female slave in Gao. “We would like to see if they can take a case to court for compensation,” said Temedt’s Akeratane. At the time of writing Temedt was also exploring the possibility of bringing forward a case for child abduction for his son, Ahmed.

“The difficulty of constructing a case for Iddar demonstrates the need for a law criminalising slavery in Mali,” said Romana Cacchioli from Anti-Slavery International, a London-based human rights organisation which is supporting Temedt’s efforts.

But according to Akeratane, when interviewed in April in Malian paper Nouvelle Republique, there are currently many cases awaiting judgement and going nowhere fast, which sets an unpromising precedent for future ex-slaves who wish to pursue justice.

Shifting attitudes

One of Temedt’s principal goals is to instil a sense of pride in ex-slaves for their ethnic and cultural identity, which Akeratane hopes will help them to demand equal rights. The organisation runs human rights awareness sessions for groups vulnerable to slavery to make them aware they do not have to accept the tradition.

Support for the organisation is growing. Temedt has been in operation for just over two years and now has 18,000 members across eight regions of the country. It has also started to work with anti-slavery groups across the borders in Niger and Mauritania. Akeratane believes this is the first time the sensitive issue of continuing slavery is being tackled head -on in the country.

He is confident that attitudes will shift and slavery will one day be eradicated in Mali. Gamer Dicko, a Bamako-based journalist who comes from a black Tamasheq family, agrees: “Things are changing today, but very slowly. There are some black Tamasheq who say OK, our fathers were slaves but we are not. They are proud of their dress and speaking their own language.”

[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]

To comment on this article, please click here.


BBC EXPOSES NIGERIAN SOCCER CON-MEN

July 15, 2008 11:04 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

An undercover BBC investigation has exposed how young African footballers are being conned out of thousands of dollars by Nigerian fraudsters.
They prey on the thousands of amateur players who post their details online hoping to be spotted by English agents.
One gang which was confronted pretended to be Manchester United officials working with manager Sir Alex Ferguson.
Another conman was impersonating the chief talent scout for Chelsea to trick naive teenagers into wiring him cash.
Victims are often duped into sending money in the false belief that they are paying official registration fees to have a trial to play for their favourite English Premier League clubs.
The fraudsters simply pocket the money and disappear....read full story here

To comment on this article, please click here.


IMF Executive Board Completes Sixth and Final Review

July 15, 2008 10:34 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has completed the sixth and final review of Malawi’s economic performance under a three-year Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) arrangement.

In the context of this review the Executive Board decided to increase access under the program by SDR 10.41 million (about US$16.9 million) to SDR 48.58 million (about US$ 79.0 million), to help meet a larger balance of payments need brought about by higher fuel and fertilizer prices. The Executive Board also waived the non-observance of the end-December 2007 performance criterion on central government domestic borrowing. The completion of the review enables the release of SDR 15.18 million (about US$ 24.7 million), which will fully disburse the total amount available under the arrangement.
The three-year PRGF arrangement for Malawi was approved on August 5, 2005 (see Press Release No 05/188), originally for a total amount of SDR 38.2 million (about US$ 62.1 million) to support the government’s economic program for 2005-2007.

Following the Executive Board’s discussion, Mr. Takatoshi Kato, Deputy Managing Director and Acting Chair, said:

“The Malawi authorities are to be commended for the performance under the PRGF-supported program. Helped by favorable weather and debt relief, growth has been robust, poverty has been reduced, inflation has fallen to single digits, and the debt situation has improved. A major fiscal consolidation supported a decline in interest rates and a large expansion in credit to the private sector.
“The strong growth is expected to continue and spread beyond agriculture, although rising fuel and fertilizer prices are increasing the downside risk and adding inflation pressure. Further efforts to improve the business environment would help support growth.

“Strong revenue performance helped fiscal policy implementation. However, repeated expenditure overruns remain a concern. Despite efforts to accelerate public financial management reforms, capacity constraints remain serious, and budget preparation, execution, and control need to be further strengthened. Firm fiscal discipline and continued strong political commitment will be required to meet the 2008/09 budget targets.

“Malawi has been hit hard by a large increase in the price of key imports in 2007 and 2008, notably of fuel and fertilizers. In this light, Malawi’s low level of international reserves is a concern for financial stability and food security, and against that background, the Board agreed to Malawi’s request for augmentation of access under the PRGF. Further consolidation of government net domestic debt will facilitate the further accumulation of international reserves without jeopardizing growth and crowding out the private sector. Additional donor support would help greatly in smoothing the needed adjustment.
“The monetary overhang and excess reserves in the banking sector need to be reduced. This will make monetary policy more effective in helping Malawi adjust to the external price shocks and prevent a reemergence of inflation,” Mr. Kato said.

The PRGF is the IMF’s concessional facility for low-income countries. PRGF loans carry an annual interest rate of 0.5 percent and are repayable over 10 years with a 5½-year grace period on principal payments.

To comment on this article, please click here.


TEXT OF OBAMA’S SPEECH ON AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ

July 15, 2008 10:27 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

Sixty-one years ago, George Marshall announced the plan that would come to bear his name. Much of Europe lay in ruins. The United States faced a powerful and ideological enemy intent on world domination. This menace was magnified by the recently discovered capability to destroy life on an unimaginable scale. The Soviet Union didn’t yet have an atomic bomb, but before long it would.

The challenge facing the greatest generation of Americans – the generation that had vanquished fascism on the battlefield – was how to contain this threat while extending freedom’s frontiers. Leaders like Truman and Acheson, Kennan and Marshall, knew that there was no single decisive blow that could be struck for freedom. We needed a new overarching strategy to meet the challenges of a new and dangerous world.

Such a strategy would join overwhelming military strength with sound judgment. It would shape events not just through military force, but through the force of our ideas; through economic power, intelligence and diplomacy. It would support strong allies that freely shared our ideals of liberty and democracy; open markets and the rule of law. It would foster new international institutions like the United Nations, NATO, and the World Bank, and focus on every corner of the globe. It was a strategy that saw clearly the world’s dangers, while seizing its promise.

As a general, Marshall had spent years helping FDR wage war. But the Marshall Plan – which was just one part of this strategy – helped rebuild not just allies, but also the nation that Marshall had plotted to defeat. In the speech announcing his plan, he concluded not with tough talk or definitive declarations – but rather with questions and a call for perspective. “The whole world of the future,” Marshall said, “hangs on a proper judgment.” To make that judgment, he asked the American people to examine distant events that directly affected their security and prosperity. He closed by asking: “What is needed? What can best be done? What must be done?”

What is needed? What can best be done? What must be done?

Today’s dangers are different, though no less grave. The power to destroy life on a catastrophic scale now risks falling into the hands of terrorists. The future of our security – and our planet – is held hostage to our dependence on foreign oil and gas. From the cave-spotted mountains of northwest Pakistan, to the centrifuges spinning beneath Iranian soil, we know that the American people cannot be protected by oceans or the sheer might of our military alone.

The attacks of September 11 brought this new reality into a terrible and ominous focus. On that bright and beautiful day, the world of peace and prosperity that was the legacy of our Cold War victory seemed to suddenly vanish under rubble, and twisted steel, and clouds of smoke.

But the depth of this tragedy also drew out the decency and determination of our nation. At blood banks and vigils; in schools and in the United States Congress, Americans were united – more united, even, than we were at the dawn of the Cold War. The world, too, was united against the perpetrators of this evil act, as old allies, new friends, and even long-time adversaries stood by our side. It was time – once again – for America’s might and moral suasion to be harnessed; it was time to once again shape a new security strategy for an ever-changing world.

Imagine, for a moment, what we could have done in those days, and months, and years after 9/11.

We could have deployed the full force of American power to hunt down and destroy Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, the Taliban, and all of the terrorists responsible for 9/11, while supporting real security in Afghanistan.

We could have secured loose nuclear materials around the world, and updated a 20th century non-proliferation framework to meet the challenges of the 21st.

We could have invested hundreds of billions of dollars in alternative sources of energy to grow our economy, save our planet, and end the tyranny of oil.

We could have strengthened old alliances, formed new partnerships, and renewed international institutions to advance peace and prosperity.

We could have called on a new generation to step into the strong currents of history, and to serve their country as troops and teachers, Peace Corps volunteers and police officers.

We could have secured our homeland—investing in sophisticated new protection for our ports, our trains and our power plants.

We could have rebuilt our roads and bridges, laid down new rail and broadband and electricity systems, and made college affordable for every American to strengthen our ability to compete.

We could have done that.

Instead, we have lost thousands of American lives, spent nearly a trillion dollars, alienated allies and neglected emerging threats – all in the cause of fighting a war for well over five years in a country that had absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

Blog
The Caucus
The latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.
Election Guide
More Politics News
Our men and women in uniform have accomplished every mission we have given them. What’s missing in our debate about Iraq – what has been missing since before the war began – is a discussion of the strategic consequences of Iraq and its dominance of our foreign policy. This war distracts us from every threat that we face and so many opportunities we could seize. This war diminishes our security, our standing in the world, our military, our economy, and the resources that we need to confront the challenges of the 21st century. By any measure, our single-minded and open-ended focus on Iraq is not a sound strategy for keeping America safe.

I am running for President of the United States to lead this country in a new direction – to seize this moment’s promise. Instead of being distracted from the most pressing threats that we face, I want to overcome them. Instead of pushing the entire burden of our foreign policy on to the brave men and women of our military, I want to use all elements of American power to keep us safe, and prosperous, and free. Instead of alienating ourselves from the world, I want America – once again – to lead.

As President, I will pursue a tough, smart and principled national security strategy – one that recognizes that we have interests not just in Baghdad, but in Kandahar and Karachi, in Tokyo and London, in Beijing and Berlin. I will focus this strategy on five goals essential to making America safer: ending the war in Iraq responsibly; finishing the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban; securing all nuclear weapons and materials from terrorists and rogue states; achieving true energy security; and rebuilding our alliances to meet the challenges of the 21st century.

My opponent in this campaign has served this country with honor, and we all respect his sacrifice. We both want to do what we think is best to defend the American people. But we’ve made different judgments, and would lead in very different directions. That starts with Iraq.

I opposed going to war in Iraq; Senator McCain was one of Washington’s biggest supporters for war. I warned that the invasion of a country posing no imminent threat would fan the flames of extremism, and distract us from the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban; Senator McCain claimed that we would be greeted as liberators, and that democracy would spread across the Middle East. Those were the judgments we made on the most important strategic question since the end of the Cold War.

Now, all of us recognize that we must do more than look back – we must make a judgment about how to move forward. What is needed? What can best be done? What must be done? Senator McCain wants to talk of our tactics in Iraq; I want to focus on a new strategy for Iraq and the wider world.

It has been 18 months since President Bush announced the surge. As I have said many times, our troops have performed brilliantly in lowering the level of violence. General Petraeus has used new tactics to protect the Iraqi population. We have talked directly to Sunni tribes that used to be hostile to America, and supported their fight against al Qaeda. Shiite militias have generally respected a cease-fire. Those are the facts, and all Americans welcome them.

For weeks, now, Senator McCain has argued that the gains of the surge mean that I should change my commitment to end the war. But this argument misconstrues what is necessary to succeed in Iraq, and stubbornly ignores the facts of the broader strategic picture that we face.

In the 18 months since the surge began, the strain on our military has increased, our troops and their families have borne an enormous burden, and American taxpayers have spent another $200 billion in Iraq. That’s over $10 billion each month. That is a consequence of our current strategy.

In the 18 months since the surge began, the situation in Afghanistan has deteriorated. June was our highest casualty month of the war. The Taliban has been on the offensive, even launching a brazen attack on one of our bases. Al Qaeda has a growing sanctuary in Pakistan. That is a consequence of our current strategy.

Blog
The Caucus
The latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.
Election Guide
More Politics News
In the 18 months since the surge began, as I warned at the outset – Iraq’s leaders have not made the political progress that was the purpose of the surge. They have not invested tens of billions of dollars in oil revenues to rebuild their country. They have not resolved their differences or shaped a new political compact.

That’s why I strongly stand by my plan to end this war. Now, Prime Minister Maliki’s call for a timetable for the removal of U.S. forces presents a real opportunity. It comes at a time when the American general in charge of training Iraq’s Security Forces has testified that Iraq’s Army and Police will be ready to assume responsibility for Iraq’s security in 2009. Now is the time for a responsible redeployment of our combat troops that pushes Iraq’s leaders toward a political solution, rebuilds our military, and refocuses on Afghanistan and our broader security interests.

George Bush and John McCain don’t have a strategy for success in Iraq – they have a strategy for staying in Iraq. They said we couldn’t leave when violence was up, they say we can’t leave when violence is down. They refuse to press the Iraqis to make tough choices, and they label any timetable to redeploy our troops “surrender,” even though we would be turning Iraq over to a sovereign Iraqi government – not to a terrorist enemy. Theirs is an endless focus on tactics inside Iraq, with no consideration of our strategy to face threats beyond Iraq’s borders.

At some point, a judgment must be made. Iraq is not going to be a perfect place, and we don’t have unlimited resources to try to make it one. We are not going to kill every al Qaeda sympathizer, eliminate every trace of Iranian influence, or stand up a flawless democracy before we leave – General Petraeus and Ambassador Crocker acknowledged this to me when they testified last April. That is why the accusation of surrender is false rhetoric used to justify a failed policy. In fact, true success in Iraq – victory in Iraq – will not take place in a surrender ceremony where an enemy lays down their arms. True success will take place when we leave Iraq to a government that is taking responsibility for its future – a government that prevents sectarian conflict, and ensures that the al Qaeda threat which has been beaten back by our troops does not reemerge. That is an achievable goal if we pursue a comprehensive plan to press the Iraqis stand up.

To achieve that success, I will give our military a new mission on my first day in office: ending this war. Let me be clear: we must be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in. We can safely redeploy our combat brigades at a pace that would remove them in 16 months. That would be the summer of 2010 – one year after Iraqi Security Forces will be prepared to stand up; two years from now, and more than seven years after the war began. After this redeployment, we’ll keep a residual force to perform specific missions in Iraq: targeting any remnants of al Qaeda; protecting our service members and diplomats; and training and supporting Iraq’s Security Forces, so long as the Iraqis make political progress.

We will make tactical adjustments as we implement this strategy – that is what any responsible Commander-in-Chief must do. As I have consistently said, I will consult with commanders on the ground and the Iraqi government. We will redeploy from secure areas first and volatile areas later. We will commit $2 billion to a meaningful international effort to support the more than 4 million displaced Iraqis. We will forge a new coalition to support Iraq’s future – one that includes all of Iraq’s neighbors, and also the United Nations, the World Bank, and the European Union – because we all have a stake in stability. And we will make it clear that the United States seeks no permanent bases in Iraq.

This is the future that Iraqis want. This is the future that the American people want. And this is what our common interests demand. Both America and Iraq will be more secure when the terrorist in Anbar is taken out by the Iraqi Army, and the criminal in Baghdad fears Iraqi Police, not just coalition forces. Both America and Iraq will succeed when every Arab government has an embassy open in Baghdad, and the child in Basra benefits from services provided by Iraqi dinars, not American tax dollars.

Blog
The Caucus
The latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.
Election Guide
More Politics News
And this is the future we need for our military. We cannot tolerate this strain on our forces to fight a war that hasn’t made us safer. I will restore our strength by ending this war, completing the increase of our ground forces by 65,000 soldiers and 27,000 marines, and investing in the capabilities we need to defeat conventional foes and meet the unconventional challenges of our time.

So let’s be clear. Senator McCain would have our troops continue to fight tour after tour of duty, and our taxpayers keep spending $10 billion a month indefinitely; I want Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future, and to reach the political accommodation necessary for long-term stability. That’s victory. That’s success. That’s what’s best for Iraq, that’s what’s best for America, and that’s why I will end this war as President.

In fact – as should have been apparent to President Bush and Senator McCain – the central front in the war on terror is not Iraq, and it never was. That’s why the second goal of my new strategy will be taking the fight to al Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

It is unacceptable that almost seven years after nearly 3,000 Americans were killed on our soil, the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 are still at large. Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahari are recording messages to their followers and plotting more terror. The Taliban controls parts of Afghanistan. Al Qaeda has an expanding base in Pakistan that is probably no farther from their old Afghan sanctuary than a train ride from Washington to Philadelphia. If another attack on our homeland comes, it will likely come from the same region where 9/11 was planned. And yet today, we have five times more troops in Iraq than Afghanistan.

Senator McCain said – just months ago – that “Afghanistan is not in trouble because of our diversion to Iraq.” I could not disagree more. Our troops and our NATO allies are performing heroically in Afghanistan, but I have argued for years that we lack the resources to finish the job because of our commitment to Iraq. That’s what the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said earlier this month. And that’s why, as President, I will make the fight against al Qaeda and the Taliban the top priority that it should be. This is a war that we have to win.

I will send at least two additional combat brigades to Afghanistan, and use this commitment to seek greater contributions – with fewer restrictions – from NATO allies. I will focus on training Afghan security forces and supporting an Afghan judiciary, with more resources and incentives for American officers who perform these missions. Just as we succeeded in the Cold War by supporting allies who could sustain their own security, we must realize that the 21st century’s frontlines are not only on the field of battle – they are found in the training exercise near Kabul, in the police station in Kandahar, and in the rule of law in Herat.

Moreover, lasting security will only come if we heed Marshall’s lesson, and help Afghans grow their economy from the bottom up. That’s why I’ve proposed an additional $1 billion in non-military assistance each year, with meaningful safeguards to prevent corruption and to make sure investments are made – not just in Kabul – but out in Afghanistan’s provinces. As a part of this program, we’ll invest in alternative livelihoods to poppy-growing for Afghan farmers, just as we crack down on heroin trafficking. We cannot lose Afghanistan to a future of narco-terrorism. The Afghan people must know that our commitment to their future is enduring, because the security of Afghanistan and the United States is shared.

The greatest threat to that security lies in the tribal regions of Pakistan, where terrorists train and insurgents strike into Afghanistan. We cannot tolerate a terrorist sanctuary, and as President, I won’t. We need a stronger and sustained partnership between Afghanistan, Pakistan and NATO to secure the border, to take out terrorist camps, and to crack down on cross-border insurgents. We need more troops, more helicopters, more satellites, more Predator drones in the Afghan border region. And we must make it clear that if Pakistan cannot or will not act, we will take out high-level terrorist targets like bin Laden if we have them in our sights.

Blog
The Caucus
The latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.
Election Guide
More Politics News
Make no mistake: we can’t succeed in Afghanistan or secure our homeland unless we change our Pakistan policy. We must expect more of the Pakistani government, but we must offer more than a blank check to a General who has lost the confidence of his people. It’s time to strengthen stability by standing up for the aspirations of the Pakistani people. That’s why I’m cosponsoring a bill with Joe Biden and Richard Lugar to triple non-military aid to the Pakistani people and to sustain it for a decade, while ensuring that the military assistance we do provide is used to take the fight to the Taliban and al Qaeda. We must move beyond a purely military alliance built on convenience, or face mounting popular opposition in a nuclear-armed nation at the nexus of terror and radical Islam.

Only a strong Pakistani democracy can help us move toward my third goal – securing all nuclear weapons and materials from terrorists and rogue states. One of the terrible ironies of the Iraq War is that President Bush used the threat of nuclear terrorism to invade a country that had no active nuclear program. But the fact that the President misled us into a misguided war doesn’t diminish the threat of a terrorist with a weapon of mass destruction – in fact, it has only increased it.

In those years after World War II, we worried about the deadly atom falling into the hands of the Kremlin. Now, we worry about 50 tons of highly enriched uranium – some of it poorly secured – at civilian nuclear facilities in over forty countries. Now, we worry about the breakdown of a non-proliferation framework that was designed for the bipolar world of the Cold War. Now, we worry – most of all – about a rogue state or nuclear scientist transferring the world’s deadliest weapons to the world’s most dangerous people: terrorists who won’t think twice about killing themselves and hundreds of thousands in Tel Aviv or Moscow, in London or New York.

We cannot wait any longer to protect the American people. I’ve made this a priority in the Senate, where I worked with Republican Senator Dick Lugar to pass a law accelerating our pursuit of loose nuclear materials. I’ll lead a global effort to secure all loose nuclear materials around the world during my first term as President. And I’ll develop new defenses to protect against the 21st century threat of biological weapons and cyber-terrorism – threats that I’ll discuss in more detail tomorrow.

Beyond taking these immediate, urgent steps, it’s time to send a clear message: America seeks a world with no nuclear weapons. As long as nuclear weapons exist, we must retain a strong deterrent. But instead of threatening to kick them out of the G-8, we need to work with Russia to take U.S. and Russian ballistic missiles off hair-trigger alert; to dramatically reduce the stockpiles of our nuclear weapons and material; to seek a global ban on the production of fissile material for weapons; and to expand the U.S.-Russian ban on intermediate-range missiles so that the agreement is global. By keeping our commitment under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, we’ll be in a better position to press nations like North Korea and Iran to keep theirs. In particular, it will give us more credibility and leverage in dealing with Iran.

We cannot tolerate nuclear weapons in the hands of nations that support terror. Preventing Iran from developing nuclear weapons is a vital national security interest of the United States. No tool of statecraft should be taken off the table, but Senator McCain would continue a failed policy that has seen Iran strengthen its position, advance its nuclear program, and stockpile 150 kilos of low enriched uranium. I will use all elements of American power to pressure the Iranian regime, starting with aggressive, principled and direct diplomacy – diplomacy backed with strong sanctions and without preconditions.

There will be careful preparation. I commend the work of our European allies on this important matter, and we should be full partners in that effort. Ultimately the measure of any effort is whether it leads to a change in Iranian behavior. That’s why we must pursue these tough negotiations in full coordination with our allies, bringing to bear our full influence – including, if it will advance our interests, my meeting with the appropriate Iranian leader at a time and place of my choosing.

Blog
The Caucus
The latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.
Election Guide
More Politics News
We will pursue this diplomacy with no illusions about the Iranian regime. Instead, we will present a clear choice. If you abandon your nuclear program, support for terror, and threats to Israel, there will be meaningful incentives. If you refuse, then we will ratchet up the pressure, with stronger unilateral sanctions; stronger multilateral sanctions in the Security Council, and sustained action outside the UN to isolate the Iranian regime. That’s the diplomacy we need. And the Iranians should negotiate now; by waiting, they will only face mounting pressure.

The surest way to increase our leverage against Iran in the long-run is to stop bankrolling its ambitions. That will depend on achieving my fourth goal: ending the tyranny of oil in our time.

One of the most dangerous weapons in the world today is the price of oil. We ship nearly $700 million a day to unstable or hostile nations for their oil. It pays for terrorist bombs going off from Baghdad to Beirut. It funds petro-diplomacy in Caracas and radical madrasas from Karachi to Khartoum. It takes leverage away from America and shifts it to dictators.

This immediate danger is eclipsed only by the long-term threat from climate change, which will lead to devastating weather patterns, terrible storms, drought, and famine. That means people competing for food and water in the next fifty years in the very places that have known horrific violence in the last fifty: Africa, the Middle East, and South Asia. Most disastrously, that could mean destructive storms on our shores, and the disappearance of our coastline.

This is not just an economic issue or an environmental concern – this is a national security crisis. For the sake of our security – and for every American family that is paying the price at the pump – we must end this dependence on foreign oil. And as President, that’s exactly what I’ll do. Small steps and political gimmickry just won’t do. I’ll invest $150 billion over the next ten years to put America on the path to true energy security. This fund will fast track investments in a new green energy business sector that will end our addiction to oil and create up to 5 million jobs over the next two decades, and help secure the future of our country and our planet. We’ll invest in research and development of every form of alternative energy – solar, wind, and biofuels, as well as technologies that can make coal clean and nuclear power safe. And from the moment I take office, I will let it be known that the United States of America is ready to lead again.

Never again will we sit on the sidelines, or stand in the way of global action to tackle this global challenge. I will reach out to the leaders of the biggest carbon emitting nations and ask them to join a new Global Energy Forum that will lay the foundation for the next generation of climate protocols. We will also build an alliance of oil-importing nations and work together to reduce our demand, and to break the grip of OPEC on the global economy. We’ll set a goal of an 80% reduction in global emissions by 2050. And as we develop new forms of clean energy here at home, we will share our technology and our innovations with all the nations of the world.

That is the tradition of American leadership on behalf of the global good. And that will be my fifth goal – rebuilding our alliances to meet the common challenges of the 21st century.

For all of our power, America is strongest when we act alongside strong partners. We faced down fascism with the greatest war-time alliance the world has ever known. We stood shoulder to shoulder with our NATO allies against the Soviet threat, and paid a far smaller price for the first Gulf War because we acted together with a broad coalition. We helped create the United Nations – not to constrain America’s influence, but to amplify it by advancing our values.

Now is the time for a new era of international cooperation. It’s time for America and Europe to renew our common commitment to face down the threats of the 21st century just as we did the challenges of the 20th. It’s time to strengthen our partnerships with Japan, South Korea, Australia and the world’s largest democracy – India – to create a stable and prosperous Asia. It’s time to engage China on common interests like climate change, even as we continue to encourage their shift to a more open and market-based society. It’s time to strengthen NATO by asking more of our allies, while always approaching them with the respect owed a partner. It’s time to reform the United Nations, so that this imperfect institution can become a more perfect forum to share burdens, strengthen our leverage, and promote our values. It’s time to deepen our engagement to help resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict, so that we help our ally Israel achieve true and lasting security, while helping Palestinians achieve their legitimate aspirations for statehood.

Blog
The Caucus
The latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.
Election Guide
More Politics News
And just as we renew longstanding efforts, so must we shape new ones to meet new challenges. That’s why I’ll create a Shared Security Partnership Program – a new alliance of nations to strengthen cooperative efforts to take down global terrorist networks, while standing up against torture and brutality. That’s why we’ll work with the African Union to enhance its ability to keep the peace. That’s why we’ll build a new partnership to roll back the trafficking of drugs, and guns, and gangs in the Americas. That’s what we can do if we are ready to engage the world.

We will have to provide meaningful resources to meet critical priorities. I know development assistance is not the most popular program, but as President, I will make the case to the American people that it can be our best investment in increasing the common security of the entire world. That was true with the Marshall Plan, and that must be true today. That’s why I’ll double our foreign assistance to $50 billion by 2012, and use it to support a stable future in failing states, and sustainable growth in Africa; to halve global poverty and to roll back disease. To send once more a message to those yearning faces beyond our shores that says, “You matter to us. Your future is our future. And our moment is now.”

This must be the moment when we answer the call of history. For eight years, we have paid the price for a foreign policy that lectures without listening; that divides us from one another – and from the world – instead of calling us to a common purpose; that focuses on our tactics in fighting a war without end in Iraq instead of forging a new strategy to face down the true threats that we face. We cannot afford four more years of a strategy that is out of balance and out of step with this defining moment.

None of this will be easy, but we have faced great odds before. When General Marshall first spoke about the plan that would bear his name, the rubble of Berlin had not yet been built into a wall. But Marshall knew that even the fiercest of adversaries could forge bonds of friendship founded in freedom. He had the confidence to know that the purpose and pragmatism of the American people could outlast any foe. Today, the dangers and divisions that came with the dawn of the Cold War have receded. Now, the defeat of the threats of the past has been replaced by the transnational threats of today. We know what is needed. We know what can best be done. We know what must done. Now it falls to us to act with the same sense of purpose and pragmatism as an earlier generation, to join with friends and partners to lead the world anew.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Obama, McCain clash on Iraq, Afghanistan

July 15, 2008 9:41 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

Senator Barack Obama seems to be taking the fight on foreign policy to Senator John McCain.  He seems to have seized the upper hand in making Americans focus on Afghanistan, where the real perpetrators of 9/11 are supposedly hiding, with Osam bin Laden.  Here’s an AP article about the two candidates’ postion.

To comment on this article, please click here.


SMU BASKETBALL TEAM LEARNS ABOUT AFRICAN TEAMMATES, CULTURE

July 15, 2008 9:22 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

As members of the SMU men’s basketball team workout and prepare for the upcoming season, they do so with a new perspective on three teammates and their team as a whole.

“I think now they really know like where we came from,” said senior center Bamba Fall.

“It was very eye opening,” says sophomore guard Mike Walker. “You get to know the guys on the team and everything, but to be able to see where they come from and why they act the way they act… is very enlightening.”

...read the whole article

To comment on this article, please click here.


AMBASSADOR GAMBARI BOWS OUT OF NIGER DELTA ASSIGNMENT

July 10, 2008 12:26 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Ambassador Ibrahim Gambari has decided to take himself out as Chairman of the Steering Committee for the National Summit on the Niger Delta.  Gambari is a former foreign minister of Nigeria, former Permanent Representative of Nigeria to the United Nations, former Under-Secretary for Political Affairs at the UN, and currently is adviser to secretary-general Ban Ki-Moon on Iraq and Myanmar.  Ambassador Gambari attributed his decision to what he said was a

well-orchestrated and relentless opposition from some quarters, institutions, groups and individuals who may nonetheless be central to the resolution of the crisis in the Delta.  As a result, my name has become the issue in place of the attempt at finding a just and lasting solution to the crisis in the Niger Delta.

Below is the whole press statement issued by Gambari after the jump:

I am grateful to H.E. President Yar’Adua and Vice-President Jonathan for appointing me as Chairman of the Steering Committee for the National Summit on the Niger Delta and particularly for the confidence reposed in me to help resolve one of the most intractable problems facing our country.

I wish to put on record that I did not seek the position and I am not desperate to retain it.  I felt it was my patriotic duty to accept the appointment and to discharge my duties to the best of my abilities.  I have nothing but the highest regard for the people of the Niger Delta as an integral part of the Nigerian nation.  It is my belief that the focus of this enterprise should be the Niger Delta but the perspective should be national while the international concern should not be ignored.  Furthermore, I believe that with my decades of experience in conflict resolution and management, I could make a contribution towards finding a just and lasting solution to the problem in the Niger Delta.  I could also help mobilize international support for the implementation of the concrete outcomes of the Summit.

However, in spite of the best intentions of the President and the Federal Government as well as my own commitment in accepting the position, my appointment has attracted what appears to be a well-orchestrated and relentless opposition from some quarters, institutions, groups and individuals who may nonetheless be central to the resolution of the crisis in the Delta.  As a result, my name has become the issue in place of the attempt at finding a just and lasting solution to the crisis in the Niger Delta.

In light of this, I have contacted the Presidency and asked to be excused as the Chairman of the Steering Committee of the Summit.  The laudable objectives of the federal government should not be defeated only because of the person in charge of the Steering Committee. The crisis in the Delta and the country are much bigger than an individual. And no individual must stand in the way of the resolution of the crisis, including my humble self.

I thank the President and the Federal Government of Nigeria for the opportunity and their understanding on this matter.  I stand ready to continue to make my contribution, as a Nigerian and based on my experience as a national and international civil servant, towards the peace, stability and social economic development of our country.

To comment on this article, please click here.


G8 NATIONS PROMSE SANCTIONS AGAINST MUGABE

July 9, 2008 2:52 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

allAfrica.com
8 July 2008
Posted to the web 8 July 2008
John Allen

The leaders of the world’s most powerful nations have declared they will impose financial and other sanctions on leaders they describe as “those individuals responsible for violence” in Zimbabwe.

In a statement issued by the G8 Summit in Toyako, Japan, the leaders of Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia and the United States effectively rejected the government of President Robert Mugabe as illegitimate.

“We do not accept the legitimacy of any government that does not reflect the will of the Zimbabwean people,” the leaders said. Referring to this year’s first round of elections in which Zimbabwe’s Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) won the most votes, they added: “It is important that any mediation process respect the results of the March 29, 2008 election.”

read the whole article here

To comment on this article, please click here.


Obama Gaining Among Voters With Less Formal Education

July 9, 2008 1:01 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

According to today’s Gallup Poll, Barack Obama has caught with John McCain amongst less educated voters.

PRINCETON, NJ—In June, voters with a high school education or less were as likely to prefer John McCain as to prefer Barack Obama for president. That represents a change from earlier in the campaign—McCain led Obama among this group during the prior three months, but by diminishing margins.

Voters with less formal education have been a core Democratic constituency in the last four presidential elections, preferring Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and John Kerry to their respective Republican opponents. But it is a group that Obama—who has unusually high appeal to well-educated voters—has struggled to appeal to, both in the primaries against Hillary Clinton and in the early part of the general-election campaign versus McCain. In recent months, he has clearly begun to make gains among voters with less education, even though historically, his performance still trails that of other Democratic presidential candidates.

Since March, Obama has become increasingly competitive with McCain among men and women with less formal schooling, as well as among white and nonwhite voters who did not attend school beyond 12th grade. Among each of these subgroups of voters, the Obama-McCain gap has moved 6 or 7 points in Obama’s favor over the past four months.

As a result, Obama now holds a lead over McCain among women with less formal education, and trails McCain by just 4 points among men of similar educational attainment. Obama still trails McCain by a considerable 17 points among whites with less education, but has expanded his already formidable lead among nonwhites with high school educations or less.

Overall, Obama’s gains in the polls since March (from an average 1-point deficit in March to a 3-point lead in June among all registered voters) have come disproportionately from voters with less formal education. Among the other educational groups, his support has stayed relatively constant or gained only a little in recent months. But Obama was already competitive with McCain among voters with differing levels of postsecondary education when Gallup began tracking general-election preferences in March. Now, he is competitive with McCain among all educational groups, and holds a wide lead among those with the most formal education (those with postgraduate educations).

... read the full article here

To comment on this article, please click here.


Kenya’s Finance Minister Finally Quits Over Corruption Allegations

July 9, 2008 12:18 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

Why Kimunya quit

Story by JEFF OTIENO
Publication Date: 7/9/2008
Barely 44 hours after vowing he would rather die than resign, Finance minister Amos Kimunya finally bowed to pressure and stepped aside Tuesday to allow for investigations into the controversial sale of the Grand Regency Hotel.



Mr Kimunya addresses a press conference in Nairobi on Tuesday to announce that he was stepping aside for investigations into the sale of the Grand Regency Hotel. Photo/PETERSON GITHAIGA
Mr Kimunya said he made the decision after consulting President Kibaki, his own family and colleagues.

Sources said that during one of the meetings, President Kibaki made it clear to Mr Kimunya that he should respect the vote of no-confidence passed by MPs last week and pave the way for investigations into the Grand Regency saga.

President Kibaki was at his Harambee House office Tuesday morning and sources said he held another meeting with Mr Kimunya.

After the talks, the minister called a press conference to announce that he was “stepping aside”.

He said: “I have requested his Excellency the President to be allowed to step aside to facilitate the inquiry”.

MPs who had threatened to frustrate debate on the Budget if Mr Kimunya did not resign, changed their mind after the announcement.

Mr Kimunya’s words were similar to those uttered by his predecessor at the Treasury, Mr David Mwiraria, when he too stepped aside to pave the way for investigations into his alleged involvement in the Anglo Leasing scandal.

At the time, Mr Mwiraria along with his Cabinet colleague, Mr Kiraitu Murungi, resigned from the Cabinet after being mentioned adversely in connection with the Anglo Leasing scandal. The two bowed to pressure after revelations by the then Governance and Ethics permanent secretary John Githongo who later went into self-exile in Britain.

At the time, Mr Kimunya was transferred from the Lands Ministry to Finance after Mr Mwiraria quit. The then Environment minister Kivutha Kibwana was named to act as Lands minister.

Now that Mr Kimunya has stepped aside, President Kibaki can either name a substantive replacement or appoint an acting minister from serving Cabinet ministers to fill in at Finance.

Early indications from sources familiar with events leading to the announcement Tuesday were that the President was likely to name an acting minister until the investigations are completed.

In the event that the President names an acting minister, there will be limits to what the new office holder can do.

An acting Finance minister cannot sign agreements committing the Government to loans either locally or abroad. He or she cannot also sign on repayments to such international lenders as the World Bank, IMF, International Finance Corporation, or bilateral lenders.

The minister would be confined to signing routine appointments such as those of chairmen and boards of directors for parastatals, moving motions or Bills in Parliament, answering questions by MPs and answering on behalf of the Treasury during Cabinet meetings.

Mr Kimunya is the first minister in the grand coalition to step aside to pave the way for investigations.

In Parliament, Prime Minister Raila Odinga accepted that he did receive a briefing about the controversial sale of the Grand Regency Hotel from Central Bank Governor Njuguna Ndung’u.

However, he said the briefing only came after stories about the sale of the five star hotel appeared in the press.

“On April 23 this year, I received a telephone call from the Governor of the Central Bank who told me that there was something he wished to share with me as Prime Minister, concerning adverse stories appearing in the media. I met him in my office the same evening,” the PM said.

Unsigned document

He told the MPs that Prof Ndung’u presented him with an eight-page, undated, unsigned, typed document “which purported to give a background to the Central Bank’s involvement with Kamlesh Pattni and the case of the Grand Regency”.

Mr Odinga also said that 90 per cent of the payments for the hotel was still being retained in a lawyer’s bank account. The hotel was sold for $45 million or about Sh2.9 billion.

This would mean that the Government is yet to receive Sh2.6 billion. Land transactions processed by lawyers require that money paid by the buyer remains with the lawyers until the transaction is completed. However, there is a limit of how long a lawyer can keep the money.

While passing the vote of no-confidence against Mr Kimunya last Wednesday, MPs accused him and several other public officials of failing to follow the laid down rules and regulations on the sale of public assets during the sale of the hotel in Nairobi, the Safaricom Initial Public Offering and other transactions involving parastatals.

The no-confidence motion was introduced by Ikolomani MP Bonny Khalwale who also questioned the minister’s role in the controversy over the money supply contract with De La Rue.

At a public rally in his Kipipiri constituency last Sunday, Mr Kimunya laid out conditions which he said had to be met before he could resign.

Among them was that Mr Odinga, Lands minister James Orengo, Attorney-General Amos Wako and Kenya Anti Corruption Commission director Aaron Ringera also step aside to facilitate investigations.

On Tuesday, Mr Kimunya maintained that his conscience was clear on the role of the Treasury and himself in the transaction.

“I have maintained the position that I am open to an independent inquiry to prove my innocence,” he said during the press conference. With him were assistant minister Oburu Oginga and Finance permanent secretary Joseph Kinyua.

It was not known whether President Kibaki will appoint another team to investigate the sale of Grand Regency as Mr Kimunya has since dismissed the one appointed by Mr Odinga as biased.

Another parliamentary committee, headed by Nambale MP Chris Okemo is also investigating the saga. On Tuesday, the Speaker of the National Assembly, Mr Kenneth Marende, gave the Okemo team two weeks to complete its investigations.

Before stepping aside, Mr Kimunya appeared confident of surviving the tide after deputy Prime Minister Uhuru Kenyatta backed him.

Mr Kenyatta dismissed the Wako committee report, saying it had not mentioned Mr Kimunya by name. He also said that Cabinet documents should not be discussed through the media.

Mr Kimunya and Prof Ndung’u have since insisted the process used to dispose of the Grand Regency Hotel was above board and that Kenya got a good deal.

Defended deal

The Libyan ambassador to Kenya also defended the deal last week.

In an advert last Sunday, Prof Ndung’u said the hotel’s selling price was above the market value as per valuation made by three private firms Lloyd Masika Ltd, Value Zone and Ark Consultants Ltd.

The advert said the hotel was sold for Sh2.95 billion, while Value Zone had initially valued it at Sh1.62 billion, Lloyd Masika (Sh1.75 billion) and Ark Consultants (Sh2.17 billion).

“Based on the valuations, the Central Bank set the purchase price of the hotel at $45 million which translates to Sh2.95 billion at the current exchange rate,” said the CBK governor.

Source: Daily Nation, Kenya

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICAN SUN TIMES, JUNE 16-22, 2008

June 22, 2008 9:18 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
GetMore-A_10x14.jpg
8.jpg
9.jpg
10.jpg
11.jpg
12.jpg
13.jpg
14.jpg
RAMAfrica Ad.jpg
16.jpg
DELTAmasterafrica_feb26.jpg
19.jpg
20.jpg
21.jpg
24.jpg
25.jpg
28.jpg
29.jpg
30.jpg
31.jpg

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICAN SUN TIMES, JUNE 9-15, 2008

June 22, 2008 5:55 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
GetMore-A_10x14.jpg
8.jpg
9.jpg
10.jpg
11.jpg
12.jpg
13.jpg
14.jpg
RAMAfrica Ad.jpg
16.jpg
DELTAmasterafrica_feb26.jpg
19.jpg
20.jpg
21.jpg
24.jpg
25.jpg
28.jpg
29.jpg
30.jpg
31.jpg

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICAN SUN TIMES, JUNE 2-8, 2008

June 10, 2008 12:07 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
GetMore-A_10x14.jpg
8.jpg
9.jpg
10.jpg
11.jpg
12.jpg
13.jpg
14.jpg
RAMAfrica Ad.jpg
16.jpg
DELTAmasterafrica_feb26.jpg
Bair_USPress_35,5x25,4_OK-1.jpg

To comment on this article, please click here.


Obama Seals Democratic Nomination

June 3, 2008 9:28 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama
Final Primary Night
Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008
St. Paul, Minnesota

As Prepared for Delivery

Tonight, after fifty-four hard-fought contests, our primary season has finally come to an end.

Sixteen months have passed since we first stood together on the steps of the Old State Capitol in Springfield, Illinois. Thousands of miles have been traveled. Millions of voices have been heard. And because of what you said - because you decided that change must come to Washington; because you believed that this year must be different than all the rest; because you chose to listen not to your doubts or your fears but to your greatest hopes and highest aspirations, tonight we mark the end of one historic journey with the beginning of another - a journey that will bring a new and better day to America. Tonight, I can stand before you and say that I will be the Democratic nominee for President of the United States.

I want to thank every American who stood with us over the course of this campaign - through the good days and the bad; from the snows of Cedar Rapids to the sunshine of Sioux Falls. And tonight I also want to thank the men and woman who took this journey with me as fellow candidates for President.

At this defining moment for our nation, we should be proud that our party put forth one of the most talented, qualified field of individuals ever to run for this office. I have not just competed with them as rivals, I have learned from them as friends, as public servants, and as patriots who love America and are willing to work tirelessly to make this country better. They are leaders of this party, and leaders that America will turn to for years to come.

That is particularly true for the candidate who has traveled further on this journey than anyone else. Senator Hillary Clinton has made history in this campaign not just because she’s a woman who has done what no woman has done before, but because she’s a leader who inspires millions of Americans with her strength, her courage, and her commitment to the causes that brought us here tonight.

We’ve certainly had our differences over the last sixteen months. But as someone who’s shared a stage with her many times, I can tell you that what gets Hillary Clinton up in the morning - even in the face of tough odds - is exactly what sent her and Bill Clinton to sign up for their first campaign in Texas all those years ago; what sent her to work at the Children’s Defense Fund and made her fight for health care as First Lady; what led her to the United States Senate and fueled her barrier-breaking campaign for the presidency - an unyielding desire to improve the lives of ordinary Americans, no matter how difficult the fight may be. And you can rest assured that when we finally win the battle for universal health care in this country, she will be central to that victory. When we transform our energy policy and lift our children out of poverty, it will be because she worked to help make it happen. Our party and our country are better off because of her, and I am a better candidate for having had the honor to compete with Hillary Rodham Clinton.

There are those who say that this primary has somehow left us weaker and more divided. Well I say that because of this primary, there are millions of Americans who have cast their ballot for the very first time. There are Independents and Republicans who understand that this election isn’t just about the party in charge of Washington, it’s about the need to change Washington. There are young people, and African-Americans, and Latinos, and women of all ages who have voted in numbers that have broken records and inspired a nation.

All of you chose to support a candidate you believe in deeply. But at the end of the day, we aren’t the reason you came out and waited in lines that stretched block after block to make your voice heard. You didn’t do that because of me or Senator Clinton or anyone else. You did it because you know in your hearts that at this moment - a moment that will define a generation - we cannot afford to keep doing what we’ve been doing. We owe our children a better future. We owe our country a better future. And for all those who dream of that future tonight, I say - let us begin the work together. Let us unite in common effort to chart a new course for America.

In just a few short months, the Republican Party will arrive in St. Paul with a very different agenda. They will come here to nominate John McCain, a man who has served this country heroically. I honor that service, and I respect his many accomplishments, even if he chooses to deny mine. My differences with him are not personal; they are with the policies he has proposed in this campaign.

Because while John McCain can legitimately tout moments of independence from his party in the past, such independence has not been the hallmark of his presidential campaign.

It’s not change when John McCain decided to stand with George Bush ninety-five percent of the time, as he did in the Senate last year.

It’s not change when he offers four more years of Bush economic policies that have failed to create well-paying jobs, or insure our workers, or help Americans afford the skyrocketing cost of college - policies that have lowered the real incomes of the average American family, widened the gap between Wall Street and Main Street, and left our children with a mountain of debt.

And it’s not change when he promises to continue a policy in Iraq that asks everything of our brave men and women in uniform and nothing of Iraqi politicians - a policy where all we look for are reasons to stay in Iraq, while we spend billions of dollars a month on a war that isn’t making the American people any safer.

So I’ll say this - there are many words to describe John McCain’s attempt to pass off his embrace of George Bush’s policies as bipartisan and new. But change is not one of them.

Change is a foreign policy that doesn’t begin and end with a war that should’ve never been authorized and never been waged. I won’t stand here and pretend that there are many good options left in Iraq, but what’s not an option is leaving our troops in that country for the next hundred years - especially at a time when our military is overstretched, our nation is isolated, and nearly every other threat to America is being ignored.

We must be as careful getting out of Iraq as we were careless getting in - but start leaving we must. It’s time for Iraqis to take responsibility for their future. It’s time to rebuild our military and give our veterans the care they need and the benefits they deserve when they come home. It’s time to refocus our efforts on al Qaeda’s leadership and Afghanistan, and rally the world against the common threats of the 21st century - terrorism and nuclear weapons; climate change and poverty; genocide and disease. That’s what change is.

Change is realizing that meeting today’s threats requires not just our firepower, but the power of our diplomacy - tough, direct diplomacy where the President of the United States isn’t afraid to let any petty dictator know where America stands and what we stand for. We must once again have the courage and conviction to lead the free world. That is the legacy of Roosevelt, and Truman, and Kennedy. That’s what the American people want. That’s what change is.

Change is building an economy that rewards not just wealth, but the work and workers who created it. It’s understanding that the struggles facing working families can’t be solved by spending billions of dollars on more tax breaks for big corporations and wealthy CEOs, but by giving a the middle-class a tax break, and investing in our crumbling infrastructure, and transforming how we use energy, and improving our schools, and renewing our commitment to science and innovation. It’s understanding that fiscal responsibility and shared prosperity can go hand-in-hand, as they did when Bill Clinton was President.

John McCain has spent a lot of time talking about trips to Iraq in the last few weeks, but maybe if he spent some time taking trips to the cities and towns that have been hardest hit by this economy - cities in Michigan, and Ohio, and right here in Minnesota - he’d understand the kind of change that people are looking for.

Maybe if he went to Iowa and met the student who works the night shift after a full day of class and still can’t pay the medical bills for a sister who’s ill, he’d understand that she can’t afford four more years of a health care plan that only takes care of the healthy and wealthy. She needs us to pass health care plan that guarantees insurance to every American who wants it and brings down premiums for every family who needs it. That’s the change we need.

Maybe if he went to Pennsylvania and met the man who lost his job but can’t even afford the gas to drive around and look for a new one, he’d understand that we can’t afford four more years of our addiction to oil from dictators. That man needs us to pass an energy policy that works with automakers to raise fuel standards, and makes corporations pay for their pollution, and oil companies invest their record profits in a clean energy future - an energy policy that will create millions of new jobs that pay well and can’t be outsourced. That’s the change we need.

And maybe if he spent some time in the schools of South Carolina or St. Paul or where he spoke tonight in New Orleans, he’d understand that we can’t afford to leave the money behind for No Child Left Behind; that we owe it to our children to invest in early childhood education; to recruit an army of new teachers and give them better pay and more support; to finally decide that in this global economy, the chance to get a college education should not be a privilege for the wealthy few, but the birthright of every American. That’s the change we need in America. That’s why I’m running for President.

The other side will come here in September and offer a very different set of policies and positions, and that is a debate I look forward to. It is a debate the American people deserve. But what you don’t deserve is another election that’s governed by fear, and innuendo, and division. What you won’t hear from this campaign or this party is the kind of politics that uses religion as a wedge, and patriotism as a bludgeon - that sees our opponents not as competitors to challenge, but enemies to demonize. Because we may call ourselves Democrats and Republicans, but we are Americans first. We are always Americans first.

Despite what the good Senator from Arizona said tonight, I have seen people of differing views and opinions find common cause many times during my two decades in public life, and I have brought many together myself. I’ve walked arm-in-arm with community leaders on the South Side of Chicago and watched tensions fade as black, white, and Latino fought together for good jobs and good schools. I’ve sat across the table from law enforcement and civil rights advocates to reform a criminal justice system that sent thirteen innocent people to death row. And I’ve worked with friends in the other party to provide more children with health insurance and more working families with a tax break; to curb the spread of nuclear weapons and ensure that the American people know where their tax dollars are being spent; and to reduce the influence of lobbyists who have all too often set the agenda in Washington.

In our country, I have found that this cooperation happens not because we agree on everything, but because behind all the labels and false divisions and categories that define us; beyond all the petty bickering and point-scoring in Washington, Americans are a decent, generous, compassionate people, united by common challenges and common hopes. And every so often, there are moments which call on that fundamental goodness to make this country great again.

So it was for that band of patriots who declared in a Philadelphia hall the formation of a more perfect union; and for all those who gave on the fields of Gettysburg and Antietam their last full measure of devotion to save that same union.

So it was for the Greatest Generation that conquered fear itself, and liberated a continent from tyranny, and made this country home to untold opportunity and prosperity.

So it was for the workers who stood out on the picket lines; the women who shattered glass ceilings; the children who braved a Selma bridge for freedom’s cause.

So it has been for every generation that faced down the greatest challenges and the most improbable odds to leave their children a world that’s better, and kinder, and more just.

And so it must be for us.

America, this is our moment. This is our time. Our time to turn the page on the policies of the past. Our time to bring new energy and new ideas to the challenges we face. Our time to offer a new direction for the country we love.

The journey will be difficult. The road will be long. I face this challenge with profound humility, and knowledge of my own limitations. But I also face it with limitless faith in the capacity of the American people. Because if we are willing to work for it, and fight for it, and believe in it, then I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when we began to provide care for the sick and good jobs to the jobless; this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow and our planet began to heal; this was the moment when we ended a war and secured our nation and restored our image as the last, best hope on Earth. This was the moment - this was the time - when we came together to remake this great nation so that it may always reflect our very best selves, and our highest ideals. Thank you, God Bless you, and may God Bless the United States of America.

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICAN SUN TIMES, MAY 26-JUNE 1, 2008

May 29, 2008 9:15 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

FRONT PAGE

1.jpg

PAGE 2

2.jpg

PAGE 3

3.jpg

PAGE 4

4.jpg

PAGE 5

5.jpg

PAGE 6

6.jpg

PAGE 7

GetMore-A_10x14.jpg

PAGE 8

8.jpg

PAGE 9

9.jpg

PAGE 10

10.jpg

PAGE 11

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICAN SUN TIMES, MAY 19-25, 2008

May 27, 2008 6:39 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Front Page

1.pdf

Page 2

2.pdf

Page 3

3.pdf

Page 4

4.pdf

Page 5

5.pdf

Page 10

10.pdf

Page 11

11.pdf

Page 12

12.pdf

Page 13

13.pdf

Page 16

16.pdf

The African Sun Times, Africa’s No.1 Only Weekly Newspaper in America, on newsstands every Monday morning.  Pick a copy of the African Sun Times and read other pages. 

To comment on this article, please click here.


INVITATION FOR TENDER - CONSULATE-GENERAL, NEW YORK

May 26, 2008 10:46 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

CONSULATE GENERAL OF NIGERIA NEW YORK: INVITATION FOR TENDER FOR THE PURCHASE, INSTALLATION OF SECURITY SYSTEM, RENOVATION OF STAFF QUARTERS AND PURCHASE OF VEHICLES

Invitation to Tender Bid.tiff

Unable to read the above, see the wordings below after the jump:

CONSULATE GENERAL OF NIGERIA NEW YORK:
INVITATION FOR TENDER FOR THE PURCHASE, INSTALLATION OF SECURITY SYSTEM, RENOVATION OF STAFF QUARTERS
AND PURCHASE OF VEHICLES

The Consulate-General of Nigeria in New York, hereby calls on qualified Building Contractors/Professionals, Engineers, Quantity Surveyors, Home and Office Security experts and Motor vehicle dealers, to bid for the purchase and installation of security equipment, renovation of its offices, residential Staff quarters and purchase of vehicles.

Interested applicants are to contact the Administration Department as indicated below in order to obtain full details as well as ascertain and assess the scope of work to be done, compile Bill of Quantities, and submit bids for the satisfactory execution of the jobs.

This invitation is open to the public between the hours of 10.00 am to 2.00 pm, Monday to Friday, from May 26 to June 9, 2008. 

Contact Address
Consul (Administration)
Consulate General of Nigeria
Floor 12, Nigeria House
828 Second Avenue
New York NY 10017
Telephone: 212 850 2255
Email:

To comment on this article, please click here.


ZIMBABWE RUN-OFF VOTE MAY FACE YEAR DELAY

May 6, 2008 12:48 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Zim run-off vote may face year delay
Chris McGreal | Harare, Zimbabwe
05 May 2008 07:18
Zimbabwe’s ruling party has said that a second round of presidential elections could be delayed by up to a year in a move that would extend Robert Mugabe’s rule even though he admits to having lost the first round of voting five weeks ago...READ MORE

To comment on this article, please click here.


NIGERIA OIL REBELS CONSIDERING OBAMA TRUCE APPEAL

May 6, 2008 12:36 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Lagos, Nigeria
05 May 2008 12:03

Rebels who have stepped up attacks on Nigeria’s oil industry in the last month said on Sunday they were considering a ceasefire appeal by United States presidential hopeful Barack Obama.

The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (Mend) has launched five attacks on oil facilities in the Niger Delta since it resumed a campaign of violence in April, forcing Royal Dutch Shell to shut more than 164 000 barrels of oil per day (bpd).

“The Mend command is seriously considering a temporary ceasefire appeal by Senator Barack Obama. Obama is someone we respect and hold in high esteem,” the militant group said in an emailed statement.

Mend did not say when or where Obama, the leading candidate for the Democratic ticket for November’s US presidential election, made the appeal. It said it hoped the government would use any ceasefire to improve conditions for its detained leader, Henry Okah.

The militant group also claimed responsibility for an attack on Shell facilities in southern Bayelsa state on Saturday, which caused a spill and prompted the company to shut some production.

The attack came a day after a federal court ruled that Okah should be tried for treason and gun-running in secret. Angered by the ruling, Mend had threatened prompt reprisals against the oil industry.

Peace talks between the government and militants to resolve the unrest in the Delta stalled after Okah was arrested in Angola in September. He was extradited to Nigeria in February to face trial.

The volatile Niger Delta is the heart of Nigeria’s oil industry, which exports around two million barrels per day (bpd), but energy multinationals have been struggling to cope with a wave of violence in the vast area.

As part of a campaign for greater local control over oil revenues, Mend launched violent attacks in early 2006 which shut a fifth of Nigerian output and drove up world oil prices.

The latest wave of attacks and an eight-day strike by senior oil workers at US energy giant Exxon Mobil which ended on Thursday, had slashed Nigeria’s output by 50%, helping to push oil prices to new records. - Reuters

To comment on this article, please click here.


NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP ENDORSES OBAMA

May 4, 2008 12:43 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Friends of the Earth Action, a national environmental group based in Washington, D.C., announced today that it is endorsing Senator Barack Obama to be the nation’s next president.

“We endorse Senator Obama because we believe he is the best candidate for the environment,” said Friends of the Earth Action President Brent Blackwelder. “The ‘gas tax holiday’ debate is a defining moment in the presidential race. The two other candidates responded with sham solutions that won’t ease pain at the pump, but Senator Obama refused to play that typical Washington game. Instead, Obama called for real solutions that would make transportation more affordable and curb global warming. He showed the courage and candor we expect from a president.”

Experts agree that gas prices are likely to decline only slightly under a Clinton-McCain “gas tax holiday”—if they decline at all. Instead of signing onto this gimmick, Obama has called for long-term solutions that would limit oil consumption by requiring cars to be more fuel efficient and expanding transportation options including passenger rail.

Blackwelder cited Obama’s strong pro-environment record, his policy proposals, the profile he has given global warming in his campaign, and the broad mandate he is building for change as other reasons for the endorsement. Obama earned a 96 percent rating from the League of Conservation Voters during his first two years in the Senate. Blackwelder said Friends of the Earth Action plans to inform its more than 100,000 activists in the U.S. about its support for Obama and to campaign for him in remaining primaries.

Friends of the Earth Action previously endorsed John Edwards in the Democratic primary process and engaged in early state independent expenditures on his behalf.

Press release here.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Zimbabwe state media suggests power-sharing deal

April 24, 2008 8:25 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Zimbabwe State Media Suggests Power-Sharing Deal

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICANAMEDIA NEWS BRIEFS - 4/22/08

April 22, 2008 7:47 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

ZIMBABWE ELECTION RESULT WATCH

It is 24 days since the presidential election in Zimbabwe, and I am literally nauseated by the shenanigans about recounting of the votes.  I don’t know how others feel, but isn’t such a disgrace that Mugabe wouldn’t allow the results to be announced.  Now, even the recounts are being delayed, obviously the recounts don’t accord to Mr. Mugabe’s desired outcome.  You know what I don’t understand.  It is how somebody like Mugabe could live with himself, in his opulent lifestyle in his mansion, while the rest of the masses of Zimbabweans could hardly afford to eat.  But then, he trumpets his old nemesis, Britain, as the culprit of what ails Zimbabwe.  Listen, it is difficult to write about what’s going on there without feeling rather depressed, especially when African leaders are hiding from taking a decisive step to stop this travesty of justice.

ANOTHER TANZANIA MINISTER RESIGNS

Tanzania’s Infrastructure Minister, Andrew Chenge, has resigned.  This brings to four the number of Ministers, including a Prime Minister, who have resigned from the government of President Jakaya Kikwete in the last 2 months.  The other three includes Mr. Edward Lowassa, the prime minister; Mr. Nazir Karamagi, energy; and Mr. Iddrissa Msabaha, Minister for East African Cooperation, but formerly energy minister. 

LOWASSA-TANZANIA PM.tif

The three were accused in the so-called “Richmond Affair.” A U.S. company, Richmond Development Company, was awarded a contract for $172 million for the supply of 100 megawatts of emergency power, during the Tanzania drought of 2006, which had forced a reduction in capacity for hydroelectric power generation, which had led to the introduction of power rationing.

Richmond, which failed to fulfill the terms of the contract, by not delivering the 100 megawatts of electricity, quickly sold the contract to a United Arab Emirates based company, Dowans Holdings.  A parliamentary committee set up to investigate found that Richmond lacked experience, expertise and was financially incapacitated.

President Kikwete is said to be determined to stamp out corruption in Tanzania.  He sacked the country’s Central Bank governor, Daudi Ballali in December, 2007, after an audit discovered fraudulent transactions involving the repayment of external debts. 

Mr. Chenge is accused of having taken bribes in a controversial purchase of a British radar system seven years ago.  About £500,000 ($1 million) was found in an offshore account belonging to him.

KENYAN MINISTERS TO RECEIVE ASTRONOMICAL SALARIES

Kenyan Ministers will become the highest paid in the continent when they take office.  They are slated to make between $15,000 to $18,000, apart from other high-cost benefits.  Remember there are 40 ministers, and 52 assistant ministers, in which case there will be 40 permanent secretaries.  New Prime Minister alone, Mr. Raila Odinga, will be provided with 45 security operatives.  But Kenyans are said not to mind this outlandish salaries for the sake of peace.

Get this: the average Kenyan makes less than $500 annually.

Odinga Sworn in.jpg

President Mwai Kibaki.jpg

How do you justify this kind of outlandish lifestyle, even if it is supposed to bring peace?  Let’s remember that over 1,500 people died and over 600,000 people fled their homes after the disputed election.  Ordinary Kenyans paid with their lives, but the people who brought about the chaos get to live and reap the benefits of their misdeeds.

CAMEROONIANS PROTEST AGAINST BIYA

Another African dictator, President Paul Biya of the Cameroon, is under attack by the opposition for engineering constitutional change which will allow him to run in 3 three for another 7-year term of office.  Biya is 75 years old, and has vowed he would stay in office for at least another 10 years.  Hopefully, his maker would take him away before he inflicts more pain on the people of Cameroon.  Biya has ruled Cameroon for 26 years.
Biya:Protest.jpg

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICANAMEDIA TODAY, 4/20/08

April 20, 2008 12:27 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

I must confess that I am ashamed that the daily update of news on Africanamedia has been missing for 12 days now.  I am not going to promise that it would continue to appear on a daily basis, but that’s what we intend to do.  It is a more or less newsletter kind of news briefs.

THE ZIMBABWE ELECTION WATCH -

ONYEANI’S BLOG:

It is now day 22 since the presidential election in Zimbabwe, but Mugabe has decided to suppress the results of the election.  If you need background information about the election read it here. There was a hope that the Zimbabwe judiciary would exercise its independence from the clutches of Mugabe, but that doesn’t seem to be the case.  When High Court Judge Tendai Uchena ruled earlier that he would hear the case, hopes had been raised that he would order the release of the results.  But he succumbed under the threat of the Mugabe apparatus of intimidation, and ruled that he couldn’t order the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission to release the results.

But now, it is back to the usual culprits that African leaders resort to when the masses start demanding they leave the stage because of oppressing the community.  Mugabe is now blaming Britain and the opposition, as if those who constitute the opposition are not Zimbabweans.  The voters gave them a majority of seats in parliament, after the results announced the Electoral Commission, which the ZANU-PF party of Mugabe is using every means to reverse.  In his appearance at a rally marking Zimbabwe’s 28th independence anniversay, Mugabe is charging Britain and the opposition of “stealing our land.” He thinks by shouting about the land issue that most Africans agree rightly belong to Zimbabwean, he would win our sympathy.  I wrote exhaustively on this issue before, that earned me a lot of emails from whites all over the world, but I find it offensive that Mugabe lost the last election and is resorting to the land issue as excuse.  It is a sad commentary.

If Mugabe is honest with himself, after boasting that he would rather die than rig an election, and you wonder what he is doing now with the so-called recounts, he would accept his defeat and move on.  But it is the problem of leaders like him, including the Mwai Kibakis of the African continent, who cling to power because of their greed. 

MUGABE’S WIFE REASON FOR HIS CLINGING TO THE PRESIDENCY

Mugabe’s flamboyant wife, Grace Mugabe, is rumored to be responsible for President Robert Mugabe’s decision clinging to the presidency after losing the last election.  Mugabe is rumored to have assembled members of his household, as well as the security forces that support him, and told them that the game was over for him, point blank, he had told them: “I lost and I am ready to quit.”

bobgrace.jpg

But Grace Marufu Mugabe and the security forces and some highly placed members of the party, fought ferociously against Mugabe leaving the scene as it would adversely affect their lifestyle.  Grace has been spotted at the fashion capitals of the world, buying with frenzy, as if there was no tomorrow, while the masses of Zimbabwe suffer.  She doesn’t want to lose this opulent lifestyle.

ANNAN DEMANDS AFRICAN LEADERS ACT ON ZIMBABWE

Former United Nations Secretary-General, Mr. Kofi Annan, has demanded that African leaders take immediate action to resolve the Zimbabwe crisis.  It would be recalled that Mr. Annan spent weeks in Kenya resolving the crisis in that country.  He successfully brought the two warring parties to agree to a coalition government, which the two parties in Kenya agreed to abide by this week when they finally announced that appointment of opposition leader Raila Odinga as prime minister, and shared the 34 ministries equally.

Mr Annan made his comments to reporters in the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, where he held talks with Zimbabwean opposition leaders on Friday.
“On the question of Zimbabwe there has been substantial international attention.
“The question which has been posed is: where are the Africans? Where are their leaders and the countries in the region, what are they doing?
“It is a rather dangerous situation. It’s a serious crisis with impact beyond Zimbabwe.”
He said action by African leaders had helped resolve the post-election crisis in Kenya, where mediation led to the formation of a coalition government.
“You’ve just been through a crisis here, and you’ve managed to solve it, and I must say the credit goes to the Kenyan people, to the African Union - it was an African solution to an African problem,” Mr Annan said.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Africana News Tuesday - April 8, 2008

April 8, 2008 9:47 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

THE ZIMBABWE ELECTION WATCH -

ONYEANI BLOG:
It’s been 10 days since elections were held in Zimbabwe, and so far still not results have been announced for the presidential election, which pitted current strongman of Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe against opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai of the MDC (Movement for Democratic Change). 

Mugabe’s ruling party, in the results announced, lost its majority in parliament to MDC, which captured 99 seats against ZANU-PF of 97, with a breakaway MDC faction winning 7 seats, while an independent won one seat.  There are 3 three in opposition strongholds to be contested. 

What’s surprising is that even before the results of the presidential election is announced, the ruling party, ZANU-PF, announced that it has chosen the President Mugabe to contest in a run-off.  In other words, the party must know something about the results of the election, otherwise why would it be nominating a candidate for a run-off if its candidate had won.  Again, the ruling party has demanded vote recount, accusing the electoral commission of under-counting its votes.  As I observed in another article, we may be appalled as what is going on now with the results being withheld, nevertheless we have to agree that Mugabe allowed the apparatus of a free and fair election to be put in place, which seems to be haunting him now, especially having votes counted in front of respective party reps, video-taping and posting the results outside the polling stations. 

I see these ZANU-PF attempts as an preemptive strike to what they know is a defeat.  The ruling party would have trumpeted their triumph if it had won, rather than delaying the results.

MDC has of course gone to court to seek immediate announcement of the results.  The Electoral Commission has balked and challenged the authority of the court to rule on forcing it to announce the results.  Justice Tendayi Uchena of the High Court has ruled that the Court has the authority to rule on the case. 

A mystery has developed today as to the nature of the opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai’s visit to South Africa.  There is speculation that Mugabe is willing to go, but only on condition of immunity, but being prevented by the fierce opposition of the top echelon of ZANU-PF party officials, who fear investigations and imprisonment for corruption and other offences.

So far, the arrest of 7 officials of the electoral commission or 5 depending on which news group you read, for under-counting votes for the president, would have been quite comical if not part of the tragedy enveloping Zimbabwe.  Now, let’s reason here:  The government appointed these people; the government has complete control of the media; the security forces have vowed their allegiance only to President Mugabe.  How would these people then risk their lives to under-count for the President who they know would have them arrested and thrown in jail?  Does it would plausible?

Journalists Released.jpg

Finally, the two foreign journalists have been released, including a New York Times Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, Barry Bearak, who reported suffering a back injury after he fell 7 feet from his bunk onto a a concrete floor in his cell.

KENYA: Things seem to be falling apart again in Kenya, as the opposition and government disagree on the nature of their coalition government. 

Opposition leader Raila Odinga pulled out of talks with President Mwai Kibaki, accusing him of breaking an agreement over a new cabinet.

February’s deal was supposed to end the violence which followed disputed polls.

“We have resolved that negotiations… be suspended until [Kibaki’s party] fully recognises the 50/50 power-sharing arrangement and the principle of portfolio balance,” opposition spokesman Anyang’ Nyong’o told a news conference.

Mr Odinga also accuses Mr Kibaki of insisting that full executive power would remain exclusively with Kenya’s presidency.

Already, violence has again broken out in the slums of Kenya’s capital, Nairobi.

NIGERIA: Two major setbacks are going on in Nigeria: one is the devastating lack of fuel in a country that is the 8th oil producer in the world.  And this is despite billions of dollars being sunk into the energy hector.  Nigerians are spending hours trying to get gas, and it doesn’t seem it would soon be abetted.

The second is the fight against corruption.  The new president, Umaru Musa Yar’Adua seems bent on rooting out corruption, but it doesn’t seem as if the message is getting through to his ministers and officials or even to the members of the Nigerian legislative body.  Two weeks ago, the President fired two Health Ministers, Prof. Adenike Grange and her deputy.  This is Grange below.

Health Minister Grange.jpg

But now, the anti-corruption agency is reportedly ready to arrest the daughter of former President Olusegun Obasan, Senator Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello, for sharing in the loot that got the ministers fired.  Obasanjo-Bello has reported acknowledged receiving N10 million, but what irks the agency is that she has arrogantly refused to return the money.

Iyabo Obasanjo-Bello.jpg

Some members of her Senate Committee on Health are denying receiving any part of the N10 million (about $90,000).

INDIA - India has promised to invest more heavily in Africa, pegged at $500 million, according to India’s Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.  With this, India supposedly wants to check-mate China which has invested and continues to invest billions in infra-structural development in Africa.  Like China, India is also seeking natural recourses from Africa.  Mr. Singh made the promise at the first India’Africa Investment Conference in the Indian capital, Delhi. 

To comment on this article, please click here.


Africana News Sunday - April 6, 2008

April 6, 2008 11:30 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

Zimbabwe opposition leader, Morgan Tsvangirai, has spurned a call by the government party of President Robert Mugabe, ZANU-PF, for a recount of the presidential election vote.  ZANU-PF made the call earlier today, even before the results of the election is known.  Mr. Tsvangirai said the call was illegal and impractical.

Kenya - It seems all the efforts of former United Nations Secretary-General, Kofi Annan, are again crumbling as Kenyan leaders, President Mwai Kibaki and Prime Minister-designate, Raila Odinga, continue to bicker about cabinet posts.  It had been expected that the cabinet would be named today, but Odinga said disagreements are preventing the names of cabinet members from being made public.

Houston, TX - A naturalized Nigerian American citizen, Kase Lawal, who is a multimillionaire and fund-raiser for the campaign of Senator Hillary Clinton, has been accused of having a suspect past.LAWAL, Kase.jpg

In an article in the McClatchy newspapers, Lawal is alleged to have had a case brought against him by Nigeria’s anti-corruption agency, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).  Lawal denies the accusation.

Senegal - Senegal’s President Abdoulaye Wade, announced on Thursday the launching of the construction of a ‘African Renaissance” Monument, which would surpass the height of the landmark Statue of Liberty in America.  The 50 meter height bronze statue will stand atop a 100-metre hill.
Abdoulaye Wade.jpg
The reason there should be a monument in Africa: “There is a Statue of Liberty in the United States, an Arc de Triomphe and an Eiffel Tower in Paris,” Wade said at a ground-breaking ceremony as North Korean construction workers laid the foundations behind him.

New York Times - Michael Slackman of the New York Times has written how the use of cellphone is helping spread discontent of workers in Egypt.

United Nations, New York - If you missed this story on Friday, a United Nations unit has called for follow-up on justice in rampant assassinations of journalists.  The Intergovernmental Council of the International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC) will request UN Member States to assume responsibility for monitoring investigations into all killings condemned by the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)

Botswana - It seems the new president of Botwana, Lt. Gen. Khama, has packed his new government with appointments from people in the military. 
Khama, Lt. Gen.jpg
Mmegi of Botswana reports that:

Lt. General Khama is a former military commander just like his deputy, Lt. General Mompati Merafhe. Environment, Wildlife and Tourism Minister, Kitso Mokaila is a former army captain. Khama’s cousin, Dikgakgamatso Ramadeluka, the new Minister of Justice, Defence and Security left as a brigadier. The ousted Minister of Youth, Sports and Culture, Moeng Pheto held the rank of major general.

Cape Town, South Africa - If you want to learn more about sex and sexuality, get yourself off to Cape Town, South Africa.  There is an exhibition on sex going on there.  The Cape Angus reports

The Sexpo, the world’s largest adult sexuality, health and lifestyle exhibition, will be held at the International Convention Centre from May 8 to 11

Mauritania - Despite the vicious circle of slavery, it seems women in Mauritania are beginning to make some progress.  IRIN news interviewed Kadiata Malick Diallo, who said, “Our ultimate goal is equality.”

Kadiata Malick Diallo.jpg

tics and the role of women in the emerging Mauritanian democracy.

“When I was in secondary school, there was no democracy in Mauritania and we had one-party rule. I followed the progress of a few of my cousins who were politically active and calling for change, like many of the youths during that time, but all in all, my family was fairly non-political.

“I first got involved in politics in my senior year at secondary school when I joined the Association for the Revival of the Pular Language, the language of my people, the Peules. It eventually split off into different factions and I joined one of them, the National Democratic Movement [MND], which promoted the integration of ethnic communities across Mauritania.

“The MND was illegal, as were many political organisations at that time, and my family was very hesitant about me getting involved - they didn’t want the exposure. In those days many political activists were arrested and some were even tortured. I was lucky and nothing happened to me, but my husband who was a trade unionist was arrested many times.

“Political life in Mauritania has changed a lot since the 1980s. Political parties are legal now, and there’s no need for underground movements. The MND was disbanded in 1998.

“It is now accepted that women should participate in political life here. The country has taken a major step forward with the quota of 20 percent of women being elected into political office, but I think we should go still further. Our ultimate goal is equality.

“We are also calling for quotas to be extended to women trying to access non-elective office - the judiciary, high-level civil service posts, and so on. There are still only three women ministers in government today. A few women have been appointed as secretary-generals, prefects or ambassadors, but the numbers are still too low.

“Some members of parliament remain opposed to the quota - they think it is anti-democratic and promotes mediocrity. But mediocrity is not the exclusive preserve of women.

“Even here in the National Assembly, people often overlook women when they choose members to form permanent standing committees [to discuss a specific issue or bill]. Attitudes must change and we must fight for this but I still do not see men doing that yet.”

To comment on this article, please click here.


Mugabe’s Love of His Ghanaian Wife May Explain his Attitude Towards Britain

April 6, 2008 9:29 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

A British newspaper, The Independent, has speculated that Mugabe’s love for his first wife, a Ghanaian, may be responsible for his attitude towards the British government.  The British had deported his wife while he was in prison in the then Rhodesia and despite his pleas to the government not to do so.Mugabe:Ghana wife.jpg

To comment on this article, please click here.


G-8 Development Minister Reaffirm Commitment to Africa

April 6, 2008 7:55 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

TOKYO (AP) - Development ministers of the industrialized world, meeting in Tokyo, Japan, have reaffirmed their commitment to increase aid to Africa, especially at this present economic downturn in the world. The Japanese Foreign Minister who chaired the event, said: “We confirmed the importance of economic growth in developing countries,” said Japan’s Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura, who chaired the meeting.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Mugabe’s Party, ZANU-PF, Questions Vote Count

April 6, 2008 3:41 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

In an attempt to preempt the results of the presidential election, Mugabe’s Zanu-PF party is questioning the vote count and asks for recount

To comment on this article, please click here.


Zimbabwe Opposition, MDC, in Lead in Parliamentary Votes

April 3, 2008 10:10 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

The Zimbabwe opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) has won major vote for the parliamentary, according to the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, beating President Mugabe’s party, ZANU-PF, 99-97, with the breakway opposition MDC winning 7 seats.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Obama Raises $40 Million in March

April 3, 2008 10:08 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Asssociated Press (AP) reports that Sen. Barack Obama raised more than $40 million in March, compared to the $55 million he raised in February.  He added more than 218,000 new donors, bringing his total donor list to nearly 1.3 million.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Obama Catches Clinton in Support From Superdelegate Lawmakers

April 3, 2008 9:59 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Bloomberg News reports that Senator Barack Obama has pulled even with Senator Hillary Clinton in endorsements from top elected officials.

To comment on this article, please click here.


65 Gem Miners Feared Dead in Tanzania

March 30, 2008 7:37 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

Reports are coming in about 65 gem miners feared dead in Tanzania’s mining disaster, after rainfall triggered several mines to collapse in Tanzania.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Vote Counting Has Begun in Zimbabwe

March 29, 2008 11:34 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

zimbabwe election.jpg

Saturday, March 30, 2008 - Voting counting has started in Zimbabwe after voters went to the polls to see whether Zimbabweans still want autocratic President Robert Mugabe to stay in office.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Barack Obama’s Speech on Race

March 20, 2008 6:35 PM EST by Chika Onyeani


Philadelphia, PA | March 18, 2008
As Prepared for Delivery

“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.”

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution - a Constitution that had at its very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part - through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign - to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together - unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction - towards a better future for our children and our grandchildren.

This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton’s Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I’ve gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world’s poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners - an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.

It’s a story that hasn’t made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts - that out of many, we are truly one.

Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.

This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either “too black” or “not black enough.” We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country - a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems - two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth - by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:

“People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters....And in that single note - hope! - I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories - of survival, and freedom, and hope - became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn’t need to feel shame about...memories that all people might study and cherish - and with which we could start to rebuild.”

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety - the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions - the good and the bad - of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother - a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America - to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.

The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through - a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.

Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.” We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven’t fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today’s black and white students.

Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments - meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today’s urban and rural communities.

A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families - a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods - parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement - all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.

This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What’s remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.

But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it - those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations - those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience - as far as they’re concerned, no one’s handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch. They’ve worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze - a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns - this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.

This is where we are right now. It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy - particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.

But I have asserted a firm conviction - a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people - that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice if we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances - for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans—the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives - by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

Ironically, this quintessentially American - and yes, conservative - notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.

The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country - a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old—is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know—what we have seen - is that America can change. That is the true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope - the audacity to hope - for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.

In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds - by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.

In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand - that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.

For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle - as we did in the OJ trial - or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.” This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.

This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don’t have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.

This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.

This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should’ve been authorized and never should’ve been waged, and we want to talk about how we’ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

I would not be running for President if I didn’t believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation - the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.

There is one story in particularly that I’d like to leave you with today - a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King’s birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.

There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.

And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.

She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.

Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother’s problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn’t. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.

Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he’s there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.”

“I’m here because of Ashley.” By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.

But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

Photos courtesy BarackObama.com.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Negotiators near deal to stop Kenya Violence

February 21, 2008 6:34 PM EST by Uchendu Nwachukwu

“I’m beginning to see light at the end of the tunnel,” Kofi Annan, former U.N. Secretary-General and chief mediator in the process, said Thursday.

The political parties—who are trying to broker a power-sharing arrangement—were able to outline a “joint proposal that had been largely agreed on the governance structure,” according to a statement released to CNN.

Foreign Minister Moses Wetangula told CNN: “We have made tremendous progress and we have considerably narrowed our differences between the two parties. Reaching a conclusion is very close.

“A derailment of discussions is not an option available to both sides.”

The political deal could help end a spate of violence that has occurred in the country since a disputed election in December. The death toll has reach about 1,000 lives and has left thousands displaced since the election.

Problems began after Kenya’s presidential vote went for Mwai Kibaki of the Party of National Unity. Raila Odinga, the leader of the opposition Orange Democratic Movement, said the election was rigged and he and his supporters refused to recognize the election as valid.

Officials from both sides said the negotiations have centered around the creation of the post of prime minister.

Both sides have agreed in principle to create the post but not agreed on how much power a new prime minister will have. For a new prime minister post to be created, Kenya’s constitution would have to be changed.

They have also agreed to set up an independent committee to investigate irregularities in the December 27 election and suggest reforms.

A statement from Annan’s office said negotiators would meet Friday to try to conclude their work.

The violence that followed the election has broken down along tribal lines. Members of Kibaki’s Kikuyu tribe and the Luos, the tribe of Odinga, have been in the middle of the ethnic clashes. 

To comment on this article, please click here.


Comments on this Article

You are not logged in.

You must log in to post comments on Africana Media.

Forgot your password?

Don't have a username or password? Sign up now for FREE.