NICKY ANOSIKE IS “NCAA WOMAN OF THE YEAR, 2008”

November 3, 2008 12:36 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

NIKKY ANOSIKE.jpg

NDIANAPOLIS, Indiana, Oct. 25 — When a story of any woman of endurance and substance is written, it would never be complete if it doesn’t include the name of Ngozi Anosike, a woman who has raised eight incredibly high-achieving children all by herself.  Married before she had finished her high school in Nigeria, when she found herself abandoned in Staten Island, New York, after having 8 children, she made up her mind that she was going to grab success from the mouth of defeat.  She got her high school equivalency, entered into the school of nursing, graduated as a registered nurse, began working two or three shifts, and then set out to ensure that her children didn’t suffer too much. 

Out of the eight, one is a registered nurse and midwife, another a medical doctor, one just finished at Rutgers and doing her masters in nursing, another graduated from Boston University and another just signed to attend Siena College and play basketball in New York State, having turned down such schools like Fordham, Rutgers, Temple, Hofstra, Penn State, etc. He is 6’8”.  But it is not Ngozi Anosike’s story we are telling today, it is Nkolika “Nicky” Anosike we are telling today.

NICKY-ANOSIKE.jpg


Nkolika “Nicky” Anosike, a former basketball student-athlete at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, was awarded the 2008 NCAA Woman of the Year.

The award — one of the most prestigious the NCAA bestows — was accepted by her former coach at Tennessee, Pat Summit, and her mother, Ngozi Anosike. Nicky Anosike could not attend the event because she is playing professional basketball in Israel during the WNBA off-season.

The two women accepted the award at the 18th annual NCAA Woman of the Year dinner on Sunday, October 19, at the Murat Centre Egyptian Room. The award honors female student-athletes who have completed their eligibility, demonstrated academic and athletics excellence and engaged in community service and leadership opportunities.

A committee comprised of representatives from NCAA schools and conferences selected the top 30 out of 134 conference and independent nominees, 10 from each division. From the 30 honorees, nine finalists were selected, three from each division. The Committee on Women’s Athletics selected Anosike from the nine finalists.

Anosike, a native of Staten Island, N.Y., is the third NCAA Woman of the Year from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, and the second basketball student-athlete to be named NCAA Woman of the Year. She represents the Southeastern Conference (SEC).

A triple major in political science, legal studies and sociology, Anoskie was named to the SEC Academic Honor Roll four consecutive years. Her academic prowess earned her honors as ESPN the Magazine Academic All-American, second team and the SEC Boyd McWhorter Postgraduate Scholarship for Tennessee. She was regularly on the Lady Vol Honor Roll and was on the DeanÕs List, ESPN The Magazine All-District IV, first team and third team and the Thornton Center Honor Roll at Tennessee.

In addition to excelling in the classroom, Anosike was – and continues to be – an exceptional performer on the court. She played center/forward for the Lady Vols, who won the NCAA National Championship in 2007 and 2008. She was a member of one SEC regular-season and three SEC tournament championship teams and twice led the Lady Vols in blocked shots. She was a member of two USA under 19 Women’s Basketball World Championship teams and the 2007 Pan-American team. She was drafted into the WNBA by the Minnesota Lynx, where she started in all 34 games during the 2008 season and averaged 9.2 points and 6.8 rebounds per game. She is currently playing basketball in Israel during the WNBA off-season.

Outside of the classroom and the court, Anosike participated in many service and leadership roles. She served as team captain in 2007-08 and was a member of the campus Student-Athlete Advisory Committee (SAAC). She volunteered for the East Tennessee Children’s Hospital, Second Harvest, April Play Day for the local Boys and Girls Clubs, an elementary school career day and the Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure and Lady Vol Fund Run.

“Leadership through example makes a difference,” Anosike said in her personal statement on her nomination form."I have had opportunities to learn this lesson, most recently as I helped lead the Lady Vols basketball team to its eighth national championship. I was not the superstar; I did the unglamorous work that wins games and brings success in life. “Some of our most effective leaders are not in the spotlight, but lead by example through hard work and dedication. This assertion reflects who I am and what I hope to become.”

Last year’s NCAA Woman of the Year was Whitney Myers, former swimmer at the University of Arizona. Myers graduated with a degree in science education with an emphasis in biology/pre-pharmacy. She was the second NCAA Woman of the Year from the University of Arizona and the fifth swimming student-athlete to be named NCAA Woman of the Year.

NGOZI.jpg


Nicky attributes all her success to her mom, Ngozi Anosike, above, who received the NCAA Woman of the Year, 2008 Award,” on her behalf.

To comment on this article, please click here.


Candidate McCain’s Big Decision

September 3, 2008 9:03 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

From the New York Times:

More often than not, the role of a vice president is a minor one, unless some tragedy occurs. But a presidential nominee’s choice of a running mate is vitally mportant. It is his first executive decision and offers an important insight into how that nominee would lead the nation.

If John McCain wants voters to conclude, as he argues, that he has more independence and experience and better judgment than Barack Obama, he made a bad start by choosing Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska.

Mr. McCain’s supporters are valiantly trying to argue that the selection was a bold stroke that shows their candidate is a risk-taking maverick who - we can believe - will change Washington. (Mr. Obama’s call for change - now “the change we need” - has become all the rage in St. Paul.)

To us, it says the opposite. Mr. McCain’s snap choice of Ms. Palin reflects his impulsive streak: a wild play that he made after conservative activists warned him that he would face an all-out revolt in the party if he chose who he really wanted - Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut.

Why Mr. McCain would want to pander to right-wing activists - who helped George W. Bush kill off his candidacy in the 2000 primaries in a particularly ugly way - is baffling. Frankly, they have no place to go. Mr. McCain would have a lot more success demonstrating his independence, and his courage, if he stood up to them the way he did in 2000.

As far as we can tell, Mr. McCain and his aides did almost no due diligence before choosing Ms. Palin, raising serious questions about his management skills. The fact that Ms. Palin’s 17-year-old daughter is pregnant is irrelevant to her candidacy. There are, however, very serious questions about her political past and her ideology.

If Mr. McCain wanted to break with his party’s past and choose the Republicans’ first female vice presidential candidate, there are a number of politicians out there with far greater experience and stature than Ms. Palin, who has been in Alaska’s Statehouse for less than two years.

Before she was elected governor, she was mayor of a tiny Anchorage suburb, where her greatest accomplishment was raising the sales tax to build a hockey rink. According to Time magazine, she also sought to have books banned from the local library and threatened to fire the librarian....read whole article here.

To comment on this article, please click here.


American Media Tougher on Obama Than His Opponent McCain

July 28, 2008 9:38 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

By James Rainey, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
July 27, 2008

Haters of the mainstream media reheated a bit of conventional wisdom last week.

Barack Obama, they said, was getting a free ride from those insufferable liberals.

Such pronouncements, sorry to say, tend to be wrong since they describe a monolithic media that no longer exists. Information today cascades from countless outlets and channels, from the Huffington Post to Politico.com to CBS News and beyond.

But now there’s additional evidence that casts doubt on the bias claims aimed—with particular venom—at three broadcast networks.

The Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University, where researchers have tracked network news content for two decades, found that ABC, NBC and CBS were tougher on Obama than on Republican John McCain during the first six weeks of the general-election campaign.

You read it right: tougher on the Democrat.

During the evening news, the majority of statements from reporters and anchors on all three networks are neutral, the center found. And when network news people ventured opinions in recent weeks, 28% of the statements were positive for Obama and 72% negative.

Network reporting also tilted against McCain, but far less dramatically, with 43% of the statements positive and 57% negative, according to the Washington-based media center.

Conservatives have been snarling about the grotesque disparity revealed by another study, the online Tyndall Report, which showed Obama receiving more than twice as much network air time as McCain in the last month and a half. Obama got 166 minutes of coverage in the seven weeks after the end of the primary season, compared with 67 minutes for McCain, according to longtime network-news observer Andrew Tyndall.

I wrote last week that the networks should do more to better balance the air time. But I also suggested that much of the attention to Obama was far from glowing....read the full story here

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICANANEWSWORLD

July 28, 2008 6:57 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

ZIMBABWE TALKS AT A STANDSTILL

PRETORIA, Africa South, July 28 - Unnamed sources in Zimbabwe’s MDC opposition say historic talks with the governing Zanu-PF party are deadlocked.

A dispute has apparently arisen over a push by President Robert Mugabe’s party to have MDC leader Morgan Tsvangirai appointed “third vice-president”.

The MDC sources said this was “insulting”, and reflected negatively on the talks’ facilitator, President Thabo Mbeki of South Africa.

Talks began last week after a rare meeting between the two leaders.

The delicate negotiations following this year’s disputed elections are meant to be happening under a news blackout, but sources in the Tsvangirai camp have told the BBC that they have now ground to a halt… read whole story

SUDAN RALLIES BEHIND LEADER REVILED ABROAD

In today’s New York Times front-page, there is an article about how people in the Sudan, from different political spectrum, were lining up behind President Omar al-Bashir to show solidarity with him.  Last week, the prosecutor at the International Criminal Court, Luis Moreno-Ocampo, filed charges against Bashir for genocide and crimes against humanity.  The article tries to paint a picture of a Sudan that would break up if Bashir was removed or arrested, and engender a situation like Somalia.... read the full story here.

OIL UP ON NIGERIAN ATTACK, DEMAND STILL A
(AP) - Oil prices fluctuated Monday after an attack by militants on Nigerian oil pipelines and comments by Iran’s president suggested a significant increase in the country’s nuclear program. Concerns about flagging U.S. demand once again limited the gains.

Light, sweet crude for September delivery rose 77 cents to $124.03 a barrel in electronic trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange. The contract fell $2.23 to settle at $123.26 a barrel on Friday _ a drop of more than $20 in just weeks _ as investors questioned whether crude’s decline reflects a serious deterioration in demand....read the full story here

CHINA TO INVEST $3.3 BILLION IN NIGERIA’S POWER SECTOR

China is to invest the sum of $3.3 billion in Nigeria’s power sector, which has been plagued by shortages and no light supplies, sometimes reaching 30 days....read the full story here

$100 MILLION MISSING FRO NIGERIAN MISSIONS’ ACCOUNT - REPS

A whopping N10.2 billion is allegedly missing from the accounts of some Nigerian missions abroad and the Finance Committee of the House of Representatives which made the discovery has insisted that the money must be found by the Foreign Affairs Ministry and paid into the federation account...read full story here

THE MANUAL FOR DESPOTS

Robert Gabriel Mugabe and Morgan Richard Tsvangirai held hands. Mugabe tried to lift Tsvangirai’s hand above the shoulder, to join it in his in a triumphant double fist, a gesture reminiscent of the moment he held up Joshua Nkomo’s hand and with that gesture killed opposition politics in Zimbabwe for a long 12 years.

Tsvangirai may also have had Joshua Nkomo in mind, at that moment, because he seemed to resist this, his hand remained just below shoulder level, and Mugabe had to be content with a sideways shake and a toothy grin. Mugabe grinned. Tsvangirai grinned. Arthur Guseni Oliver Mutambara grinned. Thabo Mvuyelwa Mbeki grinned. They all grinned and were happy together.

It is surreal, this orgy of grinning, this sudden, blinding flashing of teeth: barely a month ago the pictures of torture camps filled television and computer screens, photographs of burnt bodies illustrated the stories of horror from Zimbabwe. Seared on the minds of millions were the story of the death of Abigail Chiroto, killed in an arson attack, and the haunting image of Joshua Bakacheza, diminished and fragile in his death, just two of the victims that made the front-page news of just about any newspaper that gave prominence to Zimbabwe. Tsvangirai was warning the world about genocide in Zimbabwe. Barely a month later he is sitting down to talk with the genocidaire-in-chief.... read the full story

To comment on this article, please click here.


Obama Addresses Berlin And The World

July 25, 2008 1:15 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

A World that Stands as One”

July 24th, 2008

Berlin, Germany

Thank you to the citizens of Berlin and to the people of Germany. Let me thank Chancellor Merkel and Foreign Minister Steinmeier for welcoming me earlier today. Thank you Mayor Wowereit, the Berlin Senate, the police, and most of all thank you for this welcome.

2008-07-24-sun.jpg

I come to Berlin as so many of my countrymen have come before. Tonight, I speak to you not as a candidate for President, but as a citizen - a proud citizen of the United States, and a fellow citizen of the world.

I know that I don’t look like the Americans who’ve previously spoken in this great city. The journey that led me here is improbable. My mother was born in the heartland of America, but my father grew up herding goats in Kenya. His father - my grandfather - was a cook, a domestic servant to the British.

At the height of the Cold War, my father decided, like so many others in the forgotten corners of the world, that his yearning - his dream - required the freedom and opportunity promised by the West. And so he wrote letter after letter to universities all across America until somebody, somewhere answered his prayer for a better life.

That is why I’m here. And you are here because you too know that yearning. This city, of all cities, knows the dream of freedom. And you know that the only reason we stand here tonight is because men and women from both of our nations came together to work, and struggle, and sacrifice for that better life.

2008-07-24-love.jpg

Ours is a partnership that truly began sixty years ago this summer, on the day when the first American plane touched down at Templehof.

On that day, much of this continent still lay in ruin. The rubble of this city had yet to be built into a wall. The Soviet shadow had swept across Eastern Europe, while in the West, America, Britain, and France took stock of their losses, and pondered how the world might be remade.

This is where the two sides met. And on the twenty-fourth of June, 1948, the Communists chose to blockade the western part of the city. They cut off food and supplies to more than two million Germans in an effort to extinguish the last flame of freedom in Berlin.

The size of our forces was no match for the much larger Soviet Army. And yet retreat would have allowed Communism to march across Europe. Where the last war had ended, another World War could have easily begun. All that stood in the way was Berlin.

And that’s when the airlift began - when the largest and most unlikely rescue in history brought food and hope to the people of this city.

The odds were stacked against success. In the winter, a heavy fog filled the sky above, and many planes were forced to turn back without dropping off the needed supplies. The streets where we stand were filled with hungry families who had no comfort from the cold.

But in the darkest hours, the people of Berlin kept the flame of hope burning. The people of Berlin refused to give up. And on one fall day, hundreds of thousands of Berliners came here, to the Tiergarten, and heard the city’s mayor implore the world not to give up on freedom. “There is only one possibility,” he said. “For us to stand together united until this battle is won...The people of Berlin have spoken. We have done our duty, and we will keep on doing our duty. People of the world: now do your duty...People of the world, look at Berlin!”

People of the world - look at Berlin!

2008-07-24-crowds.jpg

Look at Berlin, where Germans and Americans learned to work together and trust each other less than three years after facing each other on the field of battle.

Look at Berlin, where the determination of a people met the generosity of the Marshall Plan and created a German miracle; where a victory over tyranny gave rise to NATO, the greatest alliance ever formed to defend our common security.

Look at Berlin, where the bullet holes in the buildings and the somber stones and pillars near the Brandenburg Gate insist that we never forget our common humanity.

People of the world - look at Berlin, where a wall came down, a continent came together, and history proved that there is no challenge too great for a world that stands as one.

Sixty years after the airlift, we are called upon again. History has led us to a new crossroad, with new promise and new peril. When you, the German people, tore down that wall - a wall that divided East and West; freedom and tyranny; fear and hope - walls came tumbling down around the world. From Kiev to Cape Town, prison camps were closed, and the doors of democracy were opened. Markets opened too, and the spread of information and technology reduced barriers to opportunity and prosperity. While the 20th century taught us that we share a common destiny, the 21st has revealed a world more intertwined than at any time in human history.

The fall of the Berlin Wall brought new hope. But that very closeness has given rise to new dangers - dangers that cannot be contained within the borders of a country or by the distance of an ocean.

The terrorists of September 11th plotted in Hamburg and trained in Kandahar and Karachi before killing thousands from all over the globe on American soil.

As we speak, cars in Boston and factories in Beijing are melting the ice caps in the Arctic, shrinking coastlines in the Atlantic, and bringing drought to farms from Kansas to Kenya.

Poorly secured nuclear material in the former Soviet Union, or secrets from a scientist in Pakistan could help build a bomb that detonates in Paris. The poppies in Afghanistan become the heroin in Berlin. The poverty and violence in Somalia breeds the terror of tomorrow. The genocide in Darfur shames the conscience of us all.

In this new world, such dangerous currents have swept along faster than our efforts to contain them. That is why we cannot afford to be divided. No one nation, no matter how large or powerful, can defeat such challenges alone. None of us can deny these threats, or escape responsibility in meeting them. Yet, in the absence of Soviet tanks and a terrible wall, it has become easy to forget this truth. And if we’re honest with each other, we know that sometimes, on both sides of the Atlantic, we have drifted apart, and forgotten our shared destiny.

2008-07-24-screen.jpg

In Europe, the view that America is part of what has gone wrong in our world, rather than a force to help make it right, has become all too common. In America, there are voices that deride and deny the importance of Europe’s role in our security and our future. Both views miss the truth - that Europeans today are bearing new burdens and taking more responsibility in critical parts of the world; and that just as American bases built in the last century still help to defend the security of this continent, so does our country still sacrifice greatly for freedom around the globe.

Yes, there have been differences between America and Europe. No doubt, there will be differences in the future. But the burdens of global citizenship continue to bind us together. A change of leadership in Washington will not lift this burden. In this new century, Americans and Europeans alike will be required to do more - not less. Partnership and cooperation among nations is not a choice; it is the one way, the only way, to protect our common security and advance our common humanity.

That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another.

The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes; natives and immigrants; Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down.

We know they have fallen before. After centuries of strife, the people of Europe have formed a Union of promise and prosperity. Here, at the base of a column built to mark victory in war, we meet in the center of a Europe at peace. Not only have walls come down in Berlin, but they have come down in Belfast, where Protestant and Catholic found a way to live together; in the Balkans, where our Atlantic alliance ended wars and brought savage war criminals to justice; and in South Africa, where the struggle of a courageous people defeated apartheid.

So history reminds us that walls can be torn down. But the task is never easy. True partnership and true progress requires constant work and sustained sacrifice. They require sharing the burdens of development and diplomacy; of progress and peace. They require allies who will listen to each other, learn from each other and, most of all, trust each other.

That is why America cannot turn inward. That is why Europe cannot turn inward. America has no better partner than Europe. Now is the time to build new bridges across the globe as strong as the one that bound us across the Atlantic. Now is the time to join together, through constant cooperation, strong institutions, shared sacrifice, and a global commitment to progress, to meet the challenges of the 21st century. It was this spirit that led airlift planes to appear in the sky above our heads, and people to assemble where we stand today. And this is the moment when our nations - and all nations - must summon that spirit anew.

This is the moment when we must defeat terror and dry up the well of extremism that supports it. This threat is real and we cannot shrink from our responsibility to combat it. If we could create NATO to face down the Soviet Union, we can join in a new and global partnership to dismantle the networks that have struck in Madrid and Amman; in London and Bali; in Washington and New York. If we could win a battle of ideas against the communists, we can stand with the vast majority of Muslims who reject the extremism that leads to hate instead of hope.

This is the moment when we must renew our resolve to rout the terrorists who threaten our security in Afghanistan, and the traffickers who sell drugs on your streets. No one welcomes war. I recognize the enormous difficulties in Afghanistan. But my country and yours have a stake in seeing that NATO’s first mission beyond Europe’s borders is a success. For the people of Afghanistan, and for our shared security, the work must be done. America cannot do this alone. The Afghan people need our troops and your troops; our support and your support to defeat the Taliban and al Qaeda, to develop their economy, and to help them rebuild their nation. We have too much at stake to turn back now.

This is the moment when we must renew the goal of a world without nuclear weapons. The two superpowers that faced each other across the wall of this city came too close too often to destroying all we have built and all that we love. With that wall gone, we need not stand idly by and watch the further spread of the deadly atom. It is time to secure all loose nuclear materials; to stop the spread of nuclear weapons; and to reduce the arsenals from another era. This is the moment to begin the work of seeking the peace of a world without nuclear weapons.

This is the moment when every nation in Europe must have the chance to choose its own tomorrow free from the shadows of yesterday. In this century, we need a strong European Union that deepens the security and prosperity of this continent, while extending a hand abroad. In this century - in this city of all cities - we must reject the Cold War mind-set of the past, and resolve to work with Russia when we can, to stand up for our values when we must, and to seek a partnership that extends across this entire continent.

This is the moment when we must build on the wealth that open markets have created, and share its benefits more equitably. Trade has been a cornerstone of our growth and global development. But we will not be able to sustain this growth if it favors the few, and not the many. Together, we must forge trade that truly rewards the work that creates wealth, with meaningful protections for our people and our planet. This is the moment for trade that is free and fair for all.

This is the moment we must help answer the call for a new dawn in the Middle East. My country must stand with yours and with Europe in sending a direct message to Iran that it must abandon its nuclear ambitions. We must support the Lebanese who have marched and bled for democracy, and the Israelis and Palestinians who seek a secure and lasting peace. And despite past differences, this is the moment when the world should support the millions of Iraqis who seek to rebuild their lives, even as we pass responsibility to the Iraqi government and finally bring this war to a close.

This is the moment when we must come together to save this planet. Let us resolve that we will not leave our children a world where the oceans rise and famine spreads and terrible storms devastate our lands. Let us resolve that all nations - including my own - will act with the same seriousness of purpose as has your nation, and reduce the carbon we send into our atmosphere. This is the moment to give our children back their future. This is the moment to stand as one.

And this is the moment when we must give hope to those left behind in a globalized world. We must remember that the Cold War born in this city was not a battle for land or treasure. Sixty years ago, the planes that flew over Berlin did not drop bombs; instead they delivered food, and coal, and candy to grateful children. And in that show of solidarity, those pilots won more than a military victory. They won hearts and minds; love and loyalty and trust - not just from the people in this city, but from all those who heard the story of what they did here.

Now the world will watch and remember what we do here - what we do with this moment. Will we extend our hand to the people in the forgotten corners of this world who yearn for lives marked by dignity and opportunity; by security and justice? Will we lift the child in Bangladesh from poverty, shelter the refugee in Chad, and banish the scourge of AIDS in our time?

Will we stand for the human rights of the dissident in Burma, the blogger in Iran, or the voter in Zimbabwe? Will we give meaning to the words “never again” in Darfur?

Will we acknowledge that there is no more powerful example than the one each of our nations projects to the world? Will we reject torture and stand for the rule of law? Will we welcome immigrants from different lands, and shun discrimination against those who don’t look like us or worship like we do, and keep the promise of equality and opportunity for all of our people?

2008-07-24-statue.jpg

People of Berlin - people of the world - this is our moment. This is our time.

I know my country has not perfected itself. At times, we’ve struggled to keep the promise of liberty and equality for all of our people. We’ve made our share of mistakes, and there are times when our actions around the world have not lived up to our best intentions.

But I also know how much I love America. I know that for more than two centuries, we have strived - at great cost and great sacrifice - to form a more perfect union; to seek, with other nations, a more hopeful world. Our allegiance has never been to any particular tribe or kingdom - indeed, every language is spoken in our country; every culture has left its imprint on ours; every point of view is expressed in our public squares. What has always united us - what has always driven our people; what drew my father to America’s shores - is a set of ideals that speak to aspirations shared by all people: that we can live free from fear and free from want; that we can speak our minds and assemble with whomever we choose and worship as we please.

These are the aspirations that joined the fates of all nations in this city. These aspirations are bigger than anything that drives us apart. It is because of these aspirations that the airlift began. It is because of these aspirations that all free people - everywhere - became citizens of Berlin. It is in pursuit of these aspirations that a new generation - our generation - must make our mark on the world.

People of Berlin - and people of the world - the scale of our challenge is great. The road ahead will be long. But I come before you to say that we are heirs to a struggle for freedom. We are a people of improbable hope. With an eye toward the future, with resolve in our hearts, let us remember this history, and answer our destiny, and remake the world once again.

2008-07-24-obamaspeech.jpg

To comment on this article, please click here.


IRAQ LEADER MALIKI SUPPORTS OBAMA’S WITHDRAWAL PLANS

July 20, 2008 12:05 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki supports US presidential candidate Barack Obama’s plan to withdraw US troops from Iraq within 16 months. When asked in and interview with SPIEGEL when he thinks US troops should leave Iraq, Maliki responded “as soon as possible, as far as we are concerned.” He then continued: “US presidential candidate Barack Obama talks about 16 months. That, we think, would be the right timeframe for a withdrawal, with the possibility of slight changes.”

MALIKI.tiff

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki says he agrees with US presidential candidate Barack Obama’s plans for withdrawing US troops from Iraq.

Maliki was careful to back away from outright support for Obama. “Of course, this is by no means an election endorsement. Who they choose as their president is the Americans’ business,” he said. But then, apparently referring to Republican candidate John McCain’s more open-ended Iraq policy, Maliki said: “Those who operate on the premise of short time periods in Iraq today are being more realistic. Artificially prolonging the tenure of US troops in Iraq would cause problems.”
Iraq, Maliki went on to say, “would like to see the establishment of a long-term strategic treaty with the United States, which would govern the basic aspects of our economic and cultural relations.” He also emphasized though that the security agreement between the two countries should only “remain in effect in the short term.”

The comments by the Iraqi leader come as Obama embarks on a trip to both Afghanistan and Iraq as well as to Europe. Obama was in Afghanistan on Saturday to, as he said prior to his trip, “see what the situation on the ground is … and thank our troops for the heroic work that they’ve been doing.” The exact itinerary of the candidate’s trip has not been made public out of security concerns, but it is widely expected that he will arrive in Iraq on Sunday to meet with Maliki.

Maliki has long shown impatience with the open-ended presence of US troops in Iraq. In his conversation with SPIEGEL, he was once again candid about his frustration over the Bush administration’s hesitancy about agreeing to a timetable for the withdrawal of US troops. But he did say he was optimistic that such a schedule would be drawn up before Bush leaves the White House next January—a confidence that appeared justified following Friday’s joint announcement in Baghdad and Washington that Bush has now, for the first time, spoken of “a general time horizon” for moving US troops out of Iraq.
“So far the Americans have had trouble agreeing to a concrete timetable for withdrawal, because they feel it would appear tantamount to an admission of defeat,” Maliki told SPIEGEL. “But that isn’t the case at all. If we come to an agreement, it is not evidence of a defeat, but of a victory, of a severe blow we have inflicted on al-Qaida and the militias.”

He also bemoaned the fact that Baghdad has little control over the US troops in Iraq. “It is a fundamental problem for us that it should not be possible, in my country, to prosecute offences or crimes committed by US soldiers against our population,” Maliki said.

cgh/SPIEGEL

To comment on this article, please click here.


HOW OBAMA FLEW OUT OF THE COUNTRY

July 19, 2008 11:58 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

HOW OBAMA SLIPPED OUT OF COUNTRY
Sat Jul 19 2008 17:02:39 ET

Pool Report

The motorcade left Sen. Obama’s home in Chicago’s Kenwood neighborhood at 11:11 a.m. There was one Chicago Police Department patrol car, followed by two SUVs, a sedan and a press van. Riding in the press van were agent Jill, Sam, John McCormick of the Chicago Tribune and Glen Johnson of The Associated Press.

The motorcade headed north on Lake Shore Drive to I-55 (Stevenson Expressway) and toward MDW. The CPD blocked traffic for our turn onto the western perimeter of the airfield, where we arrived at 11:31 a.m.

Waiting on the tarmac was a Gulfstream III (G3) executive jet (tail number N366JA). We exited our respective vehicles at 11:34 a.m.

The crew was waiting outside for the senator’s arrival and a few photos with him near a wing. He was wearing tan slacks and a short black jacket. After fishing around in the back of one of the SUVs for his luggage (he seemed especially to be checking his suits inside a garment bag), he was on the bird by 11:36 a.m.

Also getting on the plane were eight Secret Service agents and the two reporters. The senator briefly greeted us as we walked past his seat in the forward section. Seated near him was senior spokeswoman Linda Douglass, the only staff member on the flight.

After everyone found a seat on the crowded plane, the pilot announced that the flying time would be between 80 and 85 minutes. All seemed eager for him to start the engines, since the plane had been sitting under a hot sun and the cabin temperature was likely somewhere in the 90s. Sweat had begun to roll down the faces of some of the agents.

“We’re just easing you into it,” Obama told his bodyguards, referring to the heat and the desert weather they would all be traveling to in the coming days.

As the plane taxied, the senat or, wearing a short-sleeve black shirt, chatted with Douglass. The plane was wheels up at 11:55 a.m.

Your pool asked Douglass if we could chat with the senator about his upcoming trip. She said she would check, but later told us that we would only get a brief chance to ask him a couple questions once at Reagan National Airport.

Janis, our stewardess, first served the senator his lunch (chicken and rice and broccoli). Everyone else had sandwiches, wraps, chips and candy (yes, just like on the bus), although we were served on china and given green place settings and cloth napkins.

As the plane peaked around 41,000 feet and 500 knots, according to the computer screen tracking our location at the front of the cabin, the senator read a copy of the Wall20Street Journal. Johnson had claimed an aisle seat and reported that he first read a story about off-shore oil drilling and then one about Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

By the time we were descending, at 17,000 feet, he had switched to the New York Times, spending most of his time in the Sports and Arts sections.

We were wheels down at 2:17 p.m. local and parked with the engines off by 2:24 p.m.

After getting off the plane, Douglass said there was time for “one question,” adding, “Then, we’re making him leave. He’s behind [schedule].”

Your pool, with the noise of the jet’s engines in the background, quickly asked what two or three things Obama was hoping to learn on this mission.

“Well, I’m looking forward to seeing what the situation on the ground is,” he said. “I want to, obviously, talk to the commanders and get a sense, both in Afghanistan and in Baghdad of, you know, what the most, ah, their biggest concerns are. And I want to thank our troops for the heroic work that they’ve been doing.”

Then, the senator was asked whether he plans to deliver some tough talk to Afghan President Hamid Karzai and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki about doing more to stand up the instruments of self-governance in their own nations.

“Well, you know, I’m more interested in listening than doing a lot of talking,” he said. “And I think it is very important to recognize that I’m going over there as a U.S. senator. We have one president at a time, so it’s the president’s job to deliver those messages.”

By 2:32 p.m., the motorcade was rolling. This one included two local police cars, three SUVs, a Honda Accord, a minivan equipped with lights and sirens and another local patrol car. We were off the DCA property by 2:36 p.m.

Your pool was in the Honda with Douglass. It was driven by Molly Buford, who works in Obama’s senator office and also for the campaign.

The mot orcade traveled I-395 to I-295 and then on to the Suitland Parkway, entering a northern entrance of Andrews Air Force Base at 2:57 p.m.

We passed several military helicopters and planes before arriving at 3:01 p.m. near an aircraft that had no markings, with the exception of an American flag on the tail. This was the plane that would transport the congressional delegation to their destination. A ground crew member told us it was a Boeing C-40C.

The senator greeted several military personnel waiting for him near the plane. He was carrying a laptop bag and had changed into some brown leather boots upon arrival in Washington.

The senator was also greeted by Mark Lippert, foreign policy advisor in his senate office. Douglass said he was the only member of Ob ama’s staff traveling with him on the congressional delegation trip. Douglass later told your pool that Lippert had returned in the late spring from a tour of duty in Iraq as a naval reservist.

By 3:03 p.m., the senator was on the aircraft, having been saluted by a member of the military on his way aboard. At 3:09 p.m., the plane’s door was closed. Four minutes later it was in motion and wheels up at 3:17 p.m., taking off to the south.

Later, Douglass confirmed that Sens. Jack Reed and Chuck Hagel were on the plane before our arrival. Your pool had not seen them at Andrews.

-- John McCormick, Chicago Tribune. 

To comment on this article, please click here.


AFRICANANEWSWORLD

July 17, 2008 7:54 AM EST by Chika Onyeani

Telegragh.tiff

BRITAIN’S CONSERVATIVE LEADER PRAISES OBAMA, AS HE CALLS FOR “RESPONSIBILITY REVOLUTION”

David Cameron praises Barack Obama as he calls for a “responsibility revolution”
By Lucy Cockcroft
Last Updated: 9:19PM BST 16/07/2008
David Cameron called for a “responsibility revolution” in Britain last night, as he praised Barack Obama’s warning that too many black fathers neglect their duties to their children.

The Conservative leader said that many black church leaders in this country have expressed similar anxieties, and that it was time to change the pattern of behaviour.

Mr Cameron said the Democratic candidate to become the next US President had been very “brave” in his condemnation of those fathers who do not take their responsibilities seriously.

He said: “I think he’s absolutely right. I mean I think it’s a very brave thing to do. And it will have a huge influence that he has said it.

“I’ve had a number of meetings with black church leaders who make the same point too. They are concerned about the family breakdown and social breakdown and want to see what I call a responsibility revolution take place.

“I think it is a very important part of our responsibility agenda.”

In an interview with The Guardian, Mr Cameron also said that civil rights leader Jesse Jackson was wrong when he criticised Obama’s speech on parental responsibilities as “talking down to black people”.

He acknowledged that the historic discrimination and economic disadvantage black people have experienced has had a role to play in the situation, but said: “At the same time we will never solve the long term problems unless people also take responsibility for their own lives.”

The message comes a week after the Conservative leader called for the obese, the idle and the poor to take more responsibility for themselves, saying society is too sensitive and fails to “say what needs to be said”.

He warned Britain could become a “demoralised society”, adding: “Children are growing up without boundaries, thinking they can do as they please, and why no adult will intervene to stop them - including, often, their parents. “If we are going to get any where near solving some of these problems, that has to stop.”

Speaking about his own role as a father in the interview, Mr Cameron admitted that his parenting skills are a work in progress, and disclosed that he uses the “naughty step” to discipline his children.

Mr Cameron said that in the past two years he has taken the Conservative Party to the second stage in its modernisation agenda, likening the process to moving beyond level one in the computer game Tomb Raider.

He said level one had required him to prove that he was a “reasonable, decent, non-discriminating, sensible, practical person who understands the world as it is lived today, who wants to live in the modern world and who accepts what that means.”

Now he has conquered that stage, he says it “allows the Conservatives to talk about some of the difficult issues about families and responsibilities. It can lead to trouble. You take a risk every time you do it, but I think the alternative of saying nothing is that you leave out a whole important area of social reform.”

He added: “We are not going to solve poverty by just building an even bigger tax credit system. We’re going to solve poverty by looking at its causes - the drugs, alcohol, the family breakdown.”

Mr Cameron also denied he was giving a false impression of Britain by talking of a broken society. He said: “There is a general incivility that people have to put up with, people shouting on the bus or abusing you on the street or road rage.

“There is a lot of casual violence and I think it is important to draw attention to it.”

British black leaders gave Mr Cameron’s words a cautious welcome. Tony Sewell, director of Generating Genius, which encourages black youngsters to study science, said: “This is an issue that needs to be discussed, and Cameron is well placed to discuss it, as it is in keeping with the current Tory agenda around social investment.

“This used to be very much a Labour agenda, but Labour just isn’t really delivering on it.”

Mr Obama is due to meet both Mr Cameron and Gordon Brown when he visits London next week.

SOUTH AFRICA LEGALIZING PROSTITUTION DURING WORLD CUP?
SA Sex Workers.jpg
Plans to legalise prostitution for the 2010 football World Cup in South Africa have been criticised by religious groups and opposition parties.
The local authority in Durban wants legalised adult entertainment venues during the tournament.
But African Nazareth Democratic Movement (ANDM) president Thokozani Hlatshwayo said the proposal was “against the word of God”.

To comment on this article, please click here.


SLAVERY STILL EXISTS IN NORTHERN MALI

July 15, 2008 11:13 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

UN Integrated Regional Information Networks
14 July 2008
Posted to the web 15 July 2008
Gao

People continue to be enslaved in northern Mali, according to Malian human rights organisation Temedt, despite a widespread belief that slavery no longer exists in the country.

“The government believes slavery ended with independence, when many of the people who had been living as slaves in the colonial period were freed,” said Temedt President Mohammed Ag Akeratane, “but I would estimate there are still several thousand people living in slavery or slavery-like conditions in modern Mali.”

According to Temedt, which means “solidarity” in the Touareg language Tamasheq, slavery continues in the north in the region of Gao 1,200km north of the capital, Bamako, and around the town of Menaka 1,500km north of Bamako.

Most of the slavery takes place between the Berber-descended Touaregs and the indigenous Bella people who live in this region, although the Peul and Songhai communities have also been known to use slaves in the past, according to Temedt.

Iddar Ag Ogazide, a Bella, said he lived as a slave in Ansongo, 80km south of Gao, where he worked for the Touareg Ag Baye family for 35 years without receiving a salary or an education. The Ag Bayes bought his great-grandmother and inherited his family members from one generation to the next. In March 2008 Iddar finally could not take any more and hatched a successful escape plan - he is currently living in Gao.

His wife Takwalet, who escaped with him, told IRIN: “Life was hard there. Everything I did was against my will. I did all the cooking, pounding [of millet], getting water, fetching the wood and sweeping the house. I never received money; I didn’t even get any clothes.”

Murky definitions

But discussions on slavery are complex in Mali, with many people arguing it does not exist. Some Gao residents said individuals might stay with their “masters” more out of economic necessity than anything.

Today the Bella have become largely assimilated into Touareg culture, keeping similar cultural traditions and speaking the same language (Tamasheq), and many of the Bella are known as Black Tamasheq. The Touareg masters and the Bella people have lived in a complex caste system for many decades and some say little has changed in this power relationship - much of the northern region’s property and livestock remains in the Touareg hands.

The towns of Menaka and Ansongo are harsh and isolated, with few jobs and economic opportunities. “Conditions are tough in the north, but the Bella people are free to leave their masters if they wish,” said an unnamed source in the Malian government’s Territorial Administration department. “There is not an obligation, or formalised slavery,” he said.

The implication is that some Bella people may feel unable to strike out on their own and leave the protection of their rich master, who feeds them but does not pay them. “If people came out to declare openly that they were slaves, then of course the state would do something,” said the source.

But for Anti-Slavery International the situation is more clear-cut.

“Like his parents before him, Iddar was born a slave, a status ascribed to him at birth, and [he] grew up under the total control of a master who exacted labour from him for no remuneration”, said Romana Cacchioli, Africa programme coordinator with Anti-Slavery International. “In my view Iddar’s case is a clear case of slavery.”

Murky legal framework

It is not clear what the state could do in cases such as Iddar’s, as Mali has no law formally forbidding slavery. Although Mali’s constitution states all people are equal, and the country has signed up to the major international conventions banning slavery, including the UN International Declaration on Human Rights, officially the practice was never criminalised in Mali, which makes it difficult to seek legal redress in cases such as Iddar Ag Ogazide’s.

Nevertheless, Temedt has instructed a lawyer to work with Iddar and another escaped female slave in Gao. “We would like to see if they can take a case to court for compensation,” said Temedt’s Akeratane. At the time of writing Temedt was also exploring the possibility of bringing forward a case for child abduction for his son, Ahmed.

“The difficulty of constructing a case for Iddar demonstrates the need for a law criminalising slavery in Mali,” said Romana Cacchioli from Anti-Slavery International, a London-based human rights organisation which is supporting Temedt’s efforts.

But according to Akeratane, when interviewed in April in Malian paper Nouvelle Republique, there are currently many cases awaiting judgement and going nowhere fast, which sets an unpromising precedent for future ex-slaves who wish to pursue justice.

Shifting attitudes

One of Temedt’s principal goals is to instil a sense of pride in ex-slaves for their ethnic and cultural identity, which Akeratane hopes will help them to demand equal rights. The organisation runs human rights awareness sessions for groups vulnerable to slavery to make them aware they do not have to accept the tradition.

Support for the organisation is growing. Temedt has been in operation for just over two years and now has 18,000 members across eight regions of the country. It has also started to work with anti-slavery groups across the borders in Niger and Mauritania. Akeratane believes this is the first time the sensitive issue of continuing slavery is being tackled head -on in the country.

He is confident that attitudes will shift and slavery will one day be eradicated in Mali. Gamer Dicko, a Bamako-based journalist who comes from a black Tamasheq family, agrees: “Things are changing today, but very slowly. There are some black Tamasheq who say OK, our fathers were slaves but we are not. They are proud of their dress and speaking their own language.”

[This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations]

To comment on this article, please click here.


BBC EXPOSES NIGERIAN SOCCER CON-MEN

July 15, 2008 11:04 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

An undercover BBC investigation has exposed how young African footballers are being conned out of thousands of dollars by Nigerian fraudsters.
They prey on the thousands of amateur players who post their details online hoping to be spotted by English agents.
One gang which was confronted pretended to be Manchester United officials working with manager Sir Alex Ferguson.
Another conman was impersonating the chief talent scout for Chelsea to trick naive teenagers into wiring him cash.
Victims are often duped into sending money in the false belief that they are paying official registration fees to have a trial to play for their favourite English Premier League clubs.
The fraudsters simply pocket the money and disappear....read full story here

To comment on this article, please click here.


IMF Executive Board Completes Sixth and Final Review

July 15, 2008 10:34 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has completed the sixth and final review of Malawi’s economic performance under a three-year Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) arrangement.

In the context of this review the Executive Board decided to increase access under the program by SDR 10.41 million (about US$16.9 million) to SDR 48.58 million (about US$ 79.0 million), to help meet a larger balance of payments need brought about by higher fuel and fertilizer prices. The Executive Board also waived the non-observance of the end-December 2007 performance criterion on central government domestic borrowing. The completion of the review enables the release of SDR 15.18 million (about US$ 24.7 million), which will fully disburse the total amount available under the arrangement.
The three-year PRGF arrangement for Malawi was approved on August 5, 2005 (see Press Release No 05/188), originally for a total amount of SDR 38.2 million (about US$ 62.1 million) to support the government’s economic program for 2005-2007.

Following the Executive Board’s discussion, Mr. Takatoshi Kato, Deputy Managing Director and Acting Chair, said:

“The Malawi authorities are to be commended for the performance under the PRGF-supported program. Helped by favorable weather and debt relief, growth has been robust, poverty has been reduced, inflation has fallen to single digits, and the debt situation has improved. A major fiscal consolidation supported a decline in interest rates and a large expansion in credit to the private sector.
“The strong growth is expected to continue and spread beyond agriculture, although rising fuel and fertilizer prices are increasing the downside risk and adding inflation pressure. Further efforts to improve the business environment would help support growth.

“Strong revenue performance helped fiscal policy implementation. However, repeated expenditure overruns remain a concern. Despite efforts to accelerate public financial management reforms, capacity constraints remain serious, and budget preparation, execution, and control need to be further strengthened. Firm fiscal discipline and continued strong political commitment will be required to meet the 2008/09 budget targets.

“Malawi has been hit hard by a large increase in the price of key imports in 2007 and 2008, notably of fuel and fertilizers. In this light, Malawi’s low level of international reserves is a concern for financial stability and food security, and against that background, the Board agreed to Malawi’s request for augmentation of access under the PRGF. Further consolidation of government net domestic debt will facilitate the further accumulation of international reserves without jeopardizing growth and crowding out the private sector. Additional donor support would help greatly in smoothing the needed adjustment.
“The monetary overhang and excess reserves in the banking sector need to be reduced. This will make monetary policy more effective in helping Malawi adjust to the external price shocks and prevent a reemergence of inflation,” Mr. Kato said.

The PRGF is the IMF’s concessional facility for low-income countries. PRGF loans carry an annual interest rate of 0.5 percent and are repayable over 10 years with a 5½-year grace period on principal payments.

To comment on this article, please click here.


TEXT OF OBAMA’S SPEECH ON AFGHANISTAN AND IRAQ

July 15, 2008 10:27 PM EST by Chika Onyeani

Sixty-one years ago, George Marshall announced the plan that would come to bear his name. Much of Europe lay in ruins. The United States faced a powerful and ideological enemy intent on world domination. This menace was magnified by the recently discovered capability to destroy life on an unimaginable scale. The Soviet Union didn’t yet have an atomic bomb, but before long it would.

The challenge facing the greatest generation of Americans – the generation that had vanquished fascism on the battlefield – was how to contain this threat while extending freedom’s frontiers. Leaders like Truman and Acheson, Kennan and Marshall, knew that there was no single decisive blow that could be struck for freedom. We needed a new overarching strategy to meet the challenges of a new and dangerous world.

Such a strategy would join overwhelming military strength with sound judgment. It would shape events not just through military force, but through the force of our ideas; through economic power, intelligence and diplomacy. It would support strong allies that freely shared our ideals of liberty and democracy; open markets and the rule of law. It would foster new international institutions like the United Nations, NATO, and the World Bank, and focus on every corner of the globe. It was a strategy that saw clearly the world’s dangers, while seizing its promise.

As a general, Marshall had spent years helping FDR wage war. But the Marshall Plan – which was just one part of this strategy – helped rebuild not just allies, but also the nation that Marshall had plotted to defeat. In the speech announcing his plan, he concluded not with tough talk or definitive declarations – but rather with questions and a call for perspective. “The whole world of the future,” Marshall said, “hangs on a proper judgment.” To make that judgment, he asked the American people to examine distant events that directly affected their security and prosperity. He closed by asking: “What is needed? What can best be done? What must be done?”

What is needed? What can best be done? What must be done?

Today’s dangers are different, though no less grave. The power to destroy life on a catastrophic scale now risks falling into the hands of terrorists. The future of our security – and our planet – is held hostage to our dependence on foreign oil and gas. From the cave-spotted mountains of northwest Pakistan, to the centrifuges spinning beneath Iranian soil, we know that the American people cannot be protected by oceans or the sheer might of our military alone.

The attacks of September 11 brought this new reality into a terrible and ominous focus. On that bright and beautiful day, the world of peace and prosperity that was the legacy of our Cold War victory seemed to suddenly vanish under rubble, and twisted steel, and clouds of smoke.

But the depth of this tragedy also drew out the decency and determination of our nation. At blood banks and vigils; in schools and in the United States Congress, Americans were united – more united, even, than we were at the dawn of the Cold War. The world, too, was united against the perpetrators of this evil act, as old allies, new friends, and even long-time adversaries stood by our side. It was time – once again – for America’s might and moral suasion to be harnessed; it was time to once again shape a new security strategy for an ever-changing world.

Imagine, for a moment, what we could have done in those days, and months, and years after 9/11.

We could have deployed the full force of American power to hunt down and destroy Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda, the Taliban, and all of the terrorists responsible for 9/11, while supporting real security in Afghanistan.

We could have secured loose nuclear materials around the world, and updated a 20th century non-proliferation framework to meet the challenges of the 21st.

We could have invested hundreds of billions of dollars in alternative sources of energy to grow our economy, save our planet, and end the tyranny of oil.

We could have strengthened old alliances, formed new partnerships, and renewed international institutions to advance peace and prosperity.

We could have called on a new generation to step into the strong currents of history, and to serve their country as troops and teachers, Peace Corps volunteers and police officers.

We could have secured our homeland—investing in sophisticated new protection for our ports, our trains and our power plants.

We could have rebuilt our roads and bridges, laid down new rail and broadband and electricity systems, and made college affordable for every American to strengthen our ability to compete.

We could have done that.

Instead, we have lost thousands of American lives, spent nearly a trillion dollars, alienated allies and neglected emerging threats – all in the cause of fighting a war for well over five years in a country that had absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

Blog
The Caucus
The latest political news from around the nation. Join the discussion.
Election Guide
More Politics News
Our men and women in uniform have accomplished every mission we have given them. What’s missing in our debate about Iraq – what has been missing since before the war began – is a discussion of the strategic consequences of Iraq and its dominan